Related Experiment Videos
Patients not seen in three years: will invitations for health checks be of benefit?
Insights
Three-yearly health checks for general practitioners in the UK show no clear benefit over opportunistic screening. Current screening programs and opportunistic approaches remain sufficient for patient care.
Area of Science:
- General Practice
- Preventive Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Mandatory three-yearly health checks for British general practitioners were introduced in April 1990.
- These checks are part of the terms of service for doctors in general practice.
- The evaluation examines the content, interval, age groups, ethics, cost, yield, and outcomes of these checks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the evidence for the benefits of obligatory three-yearly health checks for general practitioners.
- To determine if these checks should alter the current approach to screening in general practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing evidence regarding the three-yearly health checks.
- Examination of various aspects of the checks including content, frequency, and cost-effectiveness.
- Analysis of the yield and outcomes associated with the implemented screening program.
Main Results:
- No specific evidence was found to support a deviation from the current opportunistic screening approach.
- The established national screening programs were deemed adequate.
- The evaluation did not identify a compelling case for the obligatory three-yearly checks.
Conclusions:
- The current opportunistic approach to screening in general practice is supported by the available evidence.
- There is no apparent need to change from established national screening programs.
- The obligatory three-yearly checks do not demonstrate sufficient benefit to warrant their continuation over existing methods.
Abstract:
An attempt has been made to evaluate the evidence for the likely benefit or otherwise, of the obligatory three-yearly checks as defined within the terms of service for doctors in general practice introduced to British general practitioners in April 1990. The content, interval, age groups, ethics, organizational cost, yield and outcome of the three-yearly checks are examined. No particular evidence is apparent which should deflect general practice from its present opportunistic approach to screening, and the already established national screening programmes.