Randomized active-controlled phase II study of denosumab efficacy and safety in patients with breast cancer-related

Allan Lipton1, Guenther G Steger, Jazmin Figueroa

  • 1Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA. alipton@psu.edu

Abstract

Insights

Denosumab effectively suppresses bone resorption in breast cancer patients with bone metastases, showing comparable efficacy to intravenous bisphosphonates in reducing bone turnover and skeletal-related events. The drug demonstrated a favorable safety profile in this patient population.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Bone Metabolism

Background:

  • Bone metastases are a common complication in advanced breast cancer.
  • Bone resorption is a key process in the development of bone metastases.
  • Intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BPs) are standard treatment for bone metastases, but alternatives are being explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL), in patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases.
  • To compare five different subcutaneous denosumab dosing regimens against a standard IV bisphosphonate treatment.
  • To assess denosumab's impact on bone turnover markers and skeletal-related events (SREs).

Main Methods:

  • A randomized study involving 255 women with breast cancer and bone metastases.
  • Patients received subcutaneous denosumab (various doses/frequencies) or intravenous bisphosphonates.
  • Primary endpoint: change in urine N-telopeptide corrected for urine creatinine (uNTx/Cr) at week 13.
  • Secondary endpoints included SREs and safety assessments.

Main Results:

  • Denosumab treatment led to a median 71% reduction in uNTx/Cr, comparable to IV BPs (79%).
  • 74% of denosumab patients achieved >65% uNTx/Cr reduction versus 63% for IV BPs.
  • Skeletal-related events occurred in 9% of denosumab patients vs. 16% of IV BP patients.
  • No serious or fatal adverse events were attributed to denosumab.

Conclusions:

  • Subcutaneous denosumab demonstrates comparable efficacy to IV bisphosphonates in suppressing bone turnover and reducing SRE risk.
  • Denosumab presents a potentially effective and safe treatment option for breast cancer patients with bone metastases.
  • The safety profile of denosumab is consistent with that expected in advanced breast cancer patients receiving systemic therapy.