Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Cancer survival in Italian patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017" [Cancer Epidemiol. 101, April 2026, 103001].

Cancer epidemiology·2026
Same author

King's stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an 18F-FDG-PET study of brain connectivity.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Cortical Lesions Form Predominantly in Early Multiple Sclerosis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Machine learning model based on plasma proteomics for the identification of Parkinson's disease.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Gender differences in cancer epidemiology in Italy, 2013-2017.

Cancer epidemiology·2026
Same author

Modelled effect on mesothelioma mortality of the asbestos ban in Italy and the subsequent phases of exposure.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026

Related Experiment Videos

[Gender differences in avoidable mortality in Umbria (Italy).].

Liliana Minelli1, Antonio Canosa, Fabrizio Stracci

  • 1Dipartimento di Specialità Medico Chirurgiche e Sanità Pubblica- Sezione Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Perugia.

Igiene E Sanita Pubblica
|September 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study analyzed avoidable mortality differences between males and females in Italy. Findings highlight sex-based disparities in preventable deaths, crucial for public health strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Demography

Background:

  • Avoidable mortality represents deaths that could potentially be prevented through public health interventions.
  • Understanding sex-based differences in avoidable mortality is essential for targeted health policies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate disparities in avoidable mortality between males and females in Italy's Umbria region.
  • To categorize avoidable deaths based on prevention, early detection, or medical care interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized regional mortality registry (RENCAM) data from 1994-2004.
  • Classified deaths into primary prevention, early detection/treatment, and improved medical care categories.
  • Employed International Classification of Causes of Death (ICD) revisions IX and X for cause coding.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant differences in avoidable mortality rates between males and females.
  • Specific causes and intervention types showed varying effectiveness by sex.
  • Analysis revealed distinct patterns of preventable deaths across the male and female populations.

Conclusions:

  • Sex is a significant factor influencing avoidable mortality in the Umbria region.
  • Tailored public health interventions addressing sex-specific vulnerabilities are recommended.
  • Further research into sex-based disparities in healthcare access and outcomes is warranted.