Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Movement and focused attention: a failure to replicate.

A F Kramer1, M P Tham, Y Y Yeh

  • 1Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Champaign.

Perception & Psychophysics
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NUTRITIONAL RISK STATUS, DIETARY INTAKE AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE IN OLDER ADULTS WITH MOTORIC COGNITIVE RISK SYNDROME.

JAR life·2022
Same author

Physical fitness and white matter microstructure in children with overweight or obesity: the ActiveBrains project.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

<b>Cognitive and anatomical data in a healthy cohort of adults</b>.

Data in brief·2017
Same author

Enhanced Learning through Multimodal Training: Evidence from a Comprehensive Cognitive, Physical Fitness, and Neuroscience Intervention.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

Replacing sedentary time with sleep, light, or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: effects on self-regulation and executive functioning.

Journal of behavioral medicine·2016
Same author

Underlying sources of cognitive-anatomical variation in multi-modal neuroimaging and cognitive testing.

NeuroImage·2016

Researchers could not replicate the grouping-by-movement effect. Stationary distractors had a greater impact on focused attention than moving distractors, suggesting selective visual attention is possible.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Driver and Baylis (1989) reported a grouping-by-movement phenomenon where common motion aided distractor influence.
  • This effect suggested attention could be allocated to non-contiguous visual fields and implied mandatory motion processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and replicate the grouping-by-movement phenomenon.
  • To determine if attention is mandatory for stimuli sharing common motion.
  • To explore the influence of motion and proximity on focused attention.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of Driver and Baylis's methodology in Experiment 1.
  • Redundant coding of target and distractors with common movement and color in Experiment 2.
  • Adjustment of moving distractor size by cortical magnification factor in a final experiment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Stationary distractors consistently produced a larger response-compatibility effect than moving distractors.
  • Replication attempts failed to reproduce the grouping-by-movement effect.
  • Selective processing of a target, even when moving with distractors, was supported.

Conclusions:

  • The grouping-by-movement phenomenon as originally reported could not be replicated.
  • Attention is not necessarily mandatory for stimuli with common motion.
  • Subjects can selectively attend to a target despite shared motion with distractors.