Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Geometrical illusions in solid objects under ordinary viewing conditions.

P R DeLucia1, J Hochberg

  • 1Columbia University, New York, New York.

Perception & Psychophysics
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety of liposomal cytarabine CNS prophylaxis in children, adolescent and young adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with acute leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Bone marrow transplantation·2016
Same author

Attribution of intention as a function of physiognomy.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

The effect of landmark features on mental rotation times.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Soft tissue injuries to face and neck: early assessment and repair.

World journal of surgery·2001
Same author

A randomized prospective study to assess the efficacy of two cold-therapy treatments following carpal tunnel release.

Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists·2001
Same author

The W-W-Z rhomboid plasty for closure of excisional wounds.

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Visual illusions like the Müller-Lyer illusion persist with 3D objects, challenging static viewing explanations. These findings suggest perception theories must account for real-world object interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The Müller-Lyer and Ponzo illusions are well-documented visual phenomena.
  • Previous research often utilized 2D stimuli or restricted viewing conditions.
  • Theories explaining these illusions often rely on perspective or line-based cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the Müller-Lyer and Ponzo illusions using free binocular viewing of 3D objects.
  • To determine if illusions persist with volumetric, line-free objects.
  • To challenge the notion that illusions are artifacts of static or impoverished viewing conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Presentation of 3D objects, including volumetric cones and planar constructions, under free binocular viewing.
  • Measurement of illusion magnitude in relation to object properties (e.g., fin angle).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of illusion effects across different object types and viewing scenarios.

    • Main Results:

    • The Müller-Lyer illusion magnitude closely paralleled volumetric, line-free objects, similar to converging-line patterns.
    • Illusions were observed even in objects and patterns lacking oblique lines or edges.
    • A planar 'walk-through' construction with moving observers did not yield the same illusion effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual illusions are not merely artifacts of static or impoverished viewing conditions.
    • Perspective-based explanations face challenges with 3D object manifestations of these illusions.
    • Existing data do not invalidate confusion or averaging theories of visual perception.