Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
08:06

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

[Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgery].

M K Diener1, C M Seiler, G Antes

  • 1Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Unfallchirurgie und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland. markus.diener@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift Fur Alle Gebiete Der Operativen Medizen
|September 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize medical literature to aid surgical decision-making. These rigorous methods provide reliable evidence, bridging the gap between research and clinical practice for better patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Solitary precaval right renal artery and bilateral double ureter in a patient with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2023
Same author

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and individual patient data comparing minimally invasive with open oesophagectomy for cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Dissection with LigaSure Impact™ versus conventional resection in pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy (DISSECT): a single-institution randomized controlled trial.

Langenbeck's archives of surgery·2020
Same author

Endoscopic versus surgical treatment for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Surgical endoscopy·2020
Same author

Meta-analysis of α-blockade versus no blockade before adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma.

The British journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.

Obesity surgery·2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Surgical Research

Background:

  • Surgeons face information overload from vast medical publications.
  • Questionable study quality and time constraints hinder staying updated.
  • Accurate surgical decision-making is jeopardized by these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA) as solutions.
  • To highlight their role in synthesizing research for clinical practice.
  • To emphasize their value for clinicians, scientists, and policymakers.

Main Methods:

  • SR and MA involve a critically appraised synthesis of individual trials.
  • Comprehensive methods are used to control for potential bias.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
08:06

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

  • A priori defined protocols guide literature searches and quality assessments.

    • Main Results:

    • SR and MA provide qualitative evaluation and quantitative aggregation of research findings.
    • They offer valid decision-making tools for healthcare professionals.
    • Properly conducted SR and MA yield more precise treatment effect estimations than single trials.

    Conclusions:

    • SR and MA facilitate more precise estimation of surgical intervention effects.
    • They serve as an ideal basis for future research.
    • Implementation in guidelines and assessments bridges research and practice.