Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
Competition02:34

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.Intraspecific competition, which occurs between individuals of the same species, serves as a natural mechanism for regulating population size. Too much...
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Microbial Interactions: Competition01:26

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

Speciation can proceed at markedly different rates, and evolutionary biologists commonly describe these differences through the models of gradualism and punctuated equilibrium. Both patterns explain how new species arise, but they differ in the tempo and continuity of evolutionary change. In both cases, evolutionary change arises from heritable variation within populations, with natural selection often shaping traits that improve survival and reproduction under specific environmental conditions.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

GEOGRAPHY OF THE SIBLING SPECIES RELATED TO DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI, AND OF THE SEMISPECIES OF THE DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM COMPLEX.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Is Predominant Clonal Evolution a Common Evolutionary Adaptation to Parasitism in Pathogenic Parasitic Protozoa, Fungi, Bacteria, and Viruses?

Advances in parasitology·2017
Same author

Wineries, drosophila, alcohol, and Adh.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Phylogenetic character mapping of RADES Probing, a new marker for exploring the clonal evolution of expressed coding sequences in Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas disease.

Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases·2013
Same author

Climate change and the integrity of science.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

Using mitochondrial and nuclear markers to evaluate the degree of genetic cohesion among Echinococcus populations.

Experimental parasitology·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

Competition between Species: Frequency Dependence.

F J Ayala

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |February 26, 1971
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Two Drosophila species competing for resources can coexist stably. Their survival rates depend on their population sizes, demonstrating frequency-dependent fitness and stable coexistence.

    More Related Videos

    Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System
    09:23

    Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System

    Published on: November 1, 2017

    How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
    14:34

    How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

    Published on: November 10, 2010

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

    Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
    15:00

    Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

    Published on: August 18, 2023

    Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System
    09:23

    Methodology for Developing Life Tables for Sessile Insects in the Field Using the Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, in Cotton As a Model System

    Published on: November 1, 2017

    How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
    14:34

    How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

    Published on: November 10, 2010

    Area of Science:

    • Ecology
    • Evolutionary Biology
    • Population Genetics

    Background:

    • Species coexistence despite resource competition is a long-standing ecological question.
    • Understanding the factors that allow competing species to coexist is crucial for biodiversity maintenance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the conditions under which two competing species can achieve stable coexistence.
    • To determine the role of frequency-dependent fitness in interspecific competition.

    Main Methods:

    • Laboratory populations of two Drosophila species were established.
    • The relative fitness of each species was measured at different initial frequencies.
    • Competition experiments were conducted with limited resources.

    Main Results:

    • The relative fitness of each Drosophila species was inversely proportional to its relative frequency in the population.
    • This inverse relationship indicates frequency-dependent selection.
    • Stable coexistence was observed between the two competing species.

    Conclusions:

    • Frequency-dependent fitness is a key mechanism promoting the stable coexistence of competing species.
    • Interspecific competition does not necessarily lead to competitive exclusion.
    • The findings resolve decades of controversy regarding stable species coexistence under competition.