Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

A long-term retrospective study (minimum 5 years) was done looking at three groups of anterior cruciate deficient knee patients using both subjective and objective anterior cruciate tests. Twenty-seven chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees reconstructed with the middle third of the patellar tendon and 28 chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees reconstructed with the semitendinosus tendon were included in this consecutive group of patients and were felt to be directly comparable. It was found that the chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient group reconstructed with the semitendinosus tendon had 4 excellent, 10 good, 7 poor, and 7 failures with an objective score averaging 4.5 of a possible 12, while the comparable group reconstructed with the middle third of the patellar tendon had 16 excellent, 7 good, 3 poor, and only 1 failure with a score of 10 of a possible 12 (P less than 0.0032). For completeness sake, 20 anterior cruciate deficient knees from this group of consecutive patients that were reconstructed acutely with the semitendinosus tendon were also examined. This group had 8 excellent results, 9 good, 3 poor, and no failures with a score of 9.8 (P less than 0.03 compared to the other group using the semitendinosus tendon). This comparison between the two groups where the semitendinosus tendon was used in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was made only to show the difference between studies dealing with knee reconstructions. There may be a significant difference between a study dealing with acutely reconstructed knees versus one focusing on chronically reconstructed knees, most likely because of both patient selection and time between injury and reconstruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)