Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Ranks

Ranks

Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...

Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion

Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion

Richard Lazarus' cognitive mediational theory highlights the pivotal role of cognitive appraisal in shaping emotional responses. According to this theory, the evaluation of a stimulus — based on personal values, goals, beliefs, and expectations — mediates the emotional response. This appraisal process is immediate and often occurs unconsciously, influencing the intensity and nature of the resulting emotion.
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that emotions are not solely...

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of interest.

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A relationship between variables shows correlation, but it does not show cause-and-effect. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires additional controlled experiments. If no consistent relationship exists between the variables, then there is no correlation.Correlation versus CausationIf the dependent variable increases or decreases when the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Three-arm randomised controlled trial of text message reminders and financial incentives to improve antidepressant adherence among adults in primary care with depression: study protocol.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Adjunctive Psychosocial Interventions and Opioid Abstinence Among Patients Receiving Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Adiposity and inflammation mediate altered metabolic profile in individuals with opioid use disorder.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026

Same author

Workforce Investments in Telehealth Suicide Prevention in Emergency Departments: Implementation Costs of a Centralized Behavioral Health Consultation Service.

The journal of behavioral health services & research·2026

Same author

Group-Based Suicide Safety Planning and Skills Training for Veterans With High Suicide Risk: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026

Same author

Who Is Getting the Help They Need? An AI-Driven Study of Intersectional Disparities in Mental Health Service Utilization Among Young Adults with Suicidal Ideation.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Causal mediation analyses with rank preserving models.

Thomas R Ten Have¹, Marshall M Joffe, Kevin G Lynch

¹Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. ttenhave@cceb.upenn.edu

|September 11, 2007

Summary

This study introduces a novel linear rank preserving model (RPM) for mediation analysis in randomized interventions. The RPM offers improved performance under unmeasured confounding compared to standard methods, but requires careful consideration of its structural assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Causal Inference

Background:

Standard mediation analysis often assumes sequential ignorability, which may not hold when mediators are not randomly assigned.
Analyzing mediation in randomized interventions requires methods that can handle complex causal structures and potential unmeasured confounding.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a linear rank preserving model (RPM) for analyzing mediation effects in randomized interventions.
To evaluate the performance of the RPM compared to standard mediation approaches, particularly under unmeasured confounding.

Main Methods:

Developed a G-estimation procedure for the linear rank preserving model (RPM).
Extended existing work on direct effects of randomized interventions and intervention non-adherence.
Conducted simulations to assess estimation and confidence interval performance.

Main Results:

The proposed RPM approach demonstrated good estimation and confidence interval performance under unmeasured confounding.
Performance degraded when structural interaction assumptions of the RPM were violated.
The trade-offs of these assumptions were evaluated using suicide/depression intervention studies.

Conclusions:

The linear rank preserving model (RPM) provides a valuable alternative for mediation analysis in randomized interventions, especially when sequential ignorability is questionable.
Careful consideration of the RPM's structural interaction assumptions is crucial for reliable results.
The model's utility is demonstrated in the context of mental health intervention research.