Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Metabolomic profiles of dietary exposure associated with frailty in older adults: A systematic review.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2026

Same author

Enhancing employee experience and workplace well-being in oncology: a bottom-up co-construction approach in healthcare institutions in Québec.

BMC health services research·2026

Same author

Sex Differences in Long COVID Prevalence Over One year After the Acute Phase, and Related Risk Factors. The GINA-COVID Cohort Study.

International journal of women's health·2026

Same author

Study protocol to establish a prospective cohort for the study of phenotypic clusters, progression pathways, and outcomes of frailty and dependence: The CohorFES.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Bone health in patients with cancer: a SEOM-SEIOMM consensus review of risk factors, assessment strategies, and management approaches.

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico·2026

Same author

Consensus document on frailty: conceptualization, detection, multidisciplinary management and future roadmap.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Reliability and validity of structural equation modeling applied to neuroimaging data: a simulation study.

Aurélie Boucard¹, Alain Marchand, Xavier Noguès

¹Centre de Neurosciences Intégratives et Cognitives, UMR 5228, CNRS, Université Bordeaux 1, Bâtiment B2, Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence, France.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

|September 11, 2007

Summary

Structural equation modeling (SEM) can analyze neuroimaging data despite small sample sizes. While accuracy decreases with sample size, SEM models often maintain relative path coefficient strength, with the smoothing method recommended.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

fMRI Validation of fNIRS Measurements During a Naturalistic Task

fMRI Validation of fNIRS Measurements During a Naturalistic Task

Published on: June 15, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

fMRI Validation of fNIRS Measurements During a Naturalistic Task

fMRI Validation of fNIRS Measurements During a Naturalistic Task

Published on: June 15, 2015

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to quantify causal relationships in complex systems.
Its application in neuroimaging is growing, despite the typical limitation of small sample sizes.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of SEM for neuroimaging data with limited sample sizes.
To assess the impact of sample size on the validity of SEM analyses in this context.

Main Methods:

A simulation approach was used, generating artificial neuroimaging data under recursive and non-recursive models.
Structural equation modeling was applied to these simulated datasets.
Analysis quality was assessed by comparing estimated path coefficients to original values.

Main Results:

The validity and reliability of SEM decreased as sample size decreased.
Despite decreased accuracy, estimated models largely preserved the relative strength of path coefficients.
The 'smoothing method' proved effective in preventing improper solutions.
Experimental error and external network influences had minimal impact.

Conclusions:

Structural equation modeling is applicable to neuroimaging data, even with small sample sizes.
Confidence intervals are crucial when reporting SEM path coefficients from neuroimaging studies.
The smoothing method is recommended for robust SEM analyses in neuroimaging.