Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
[Cardiac resynchronization therapy in severe congestive heart failure]
Hans Morten Kristiansen1, Svein Faerestrand
1Hjerteavdelingen, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, 5021 Bergen. hanslowbarmortenlowbarkristiansen@hotmail.com
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improved patient heart function, with stable lead performance over two years. Few complications and lead re-implantations were observed in this heart failure treatment study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Context:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for severe congestive heart failure with asynchronous left ventricular contraction.
- Clinical and hemodynamic benefits of CRT are well-established.
- This study retrospectively reviews CRT outcomes at a single center.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the long-term outcomes of CRT in a cohort of heart failure patients.
- To assess operative complications, lead performance, and clinical benefits following CRT implantation.
- To analyze pacing thresholds, electrogram amplitudes, and lead impedance over a two-year follow-up period.
Summary:
- 150 patients received CRT between 1999-2006, with one-third completing a two-year follow-up.
- Significant improvement in NYHA functional capacity was observed.
- Lead re-implantation rates were 20% over two years, with stable pacing thresholds, sensing amplitudes, and impedance for all leads.
Impact:
- CRT demonstrates a favorable safety profile with few periprocedural complications.
- Implanted leads maintain stable and low threshold values throughout the two-year follow-up, ensuring reliable device function.
- The findings support the long-term efficacy and safety of CRT in managing heart failure patients.
Background:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established method for treatment of patients with severe congestive heart failure and asynchronous left ventricular contraction. Its clinical and haemodynamic benefits are well documented. We have retrospectively reviewed CRT performed at our centre.
Material And Methods:
Our department treated 150 patients with CRT according to accepted indications from 1999-2006. The patients were observed for two years and one third reached two-year follow-up. We reviewed operative complications, lead re-implantations, clinical benefits, pacing thresholds, electrogram amplitudes and lead impedance..
Results:
There were 20% lead re-implantations after two years of follow-up and a significant improvement in NYHA functional capacity. For the coronary venous lead the average stimulation threshold was stable at 1.2-1.3 V at 0.5 ms, the sensing electrogram amplitude was 10-18 mV and the impedance was 600 ohm at 5.0 V during follow-up. Similar stable electrophysiological values were measured for the right ventricular lead and the atrial lead.
Interpretation:
There were in general few peroperative complications. All implanted leads in CRT showed stable- and low threshold values during a two-year follow-up period.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents

