Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
The...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Probability in Statistics

Probability in Statistics

Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...

Power System Three-Phase Short Circuits

Power System Three-Phase Short Circuits

Determining the subtransient fault current in a power system involves representing transformers by their leakage reactances, transmission lines by their equivalent series reactances, and synchronous machines as constant voltage sources behind their subtransient reactances. In this analysis, certain elements are excluded, such as winding resistances, series resistances, shunt admittances, delta-Y phase shifts, armature resistance, saturation, saliency, non-rotating impedance loads, and small...

Determination of Expected Frequency

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Climate change and the integrity of science.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010

Same author

The elastic modulus, percolation, and disaggregation of strongly interacting, intersecting antiplane cracks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2009

Same author

The magnitude distribution of declustered earthquakes in Southern California.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2000

Same author

Earthquake prediction: the scientific challenge.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1996

Same author

A selective phenomenology of the seismicity of Southern California.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1996

Same author

The organization of seismicity on fault networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1996

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical short-term earthquake prediction.

Y Y Kagan, L Knopoff

Science (New York, N.Y.)

|June 19, 1987

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a statistical procedure to identify earthquake foreshock sequences in real-time. This method significantly improves earthquake prediction accuracy, reducing uncertainty by over 1000 times.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Seismology
Statistical modeling
Earthquake prediction

Background:

Earthquake prediction remains a significant challenge in seismology.
Identifying foreshock sequences is crucial for early warning systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a statistical procedure for real-time identification of foreshock sequences.
To assess the predictive power of this procedure for future strong earthquakes.

Main Methods:

A statistical procedure derived from a theoretical model of fracture growth was employed.
Analysis utilized a 7-year seismic database from central California with a magnitude cutoff of 1.5.
The procedure identifies foreshock sequences as they are in progress.

Main Results:

The statistical procedure reduced the uncertainty in the rate of occurrence for future strong earthquakes by over 1000 times compared to the Poisson rate.
Approximately one-third of main shocks with local magnitude ≥ 4.0 in central California were predictable.
Predictions were effective for foreshocks in the magnitude range of 2.0 to 5.0, with a time scale of hours to days.

Conclusions:

The developed statistical procedure offers a significant advancement in earthquake forecasting.
Real-time identification of foreshock sequences can substantially improve earthquake preparedness and reduce seismic risk.