Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Management strategies for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department
Shereif H Rezkalla1, Mubashir Ahmed
1Department of Cardiology, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA. rezkalla.shereif@marshfieldclinic.org
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior for acute myocardial infarction. If immediate PCI is unavailable, timely transfer or thrombolytic therapy is recommended for optimal patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management requires rapid reperfusion.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy.
- Thrombolytic therapy serves as an alternative when PCI is not immediately available.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence comparing PCI and thrombolytic therapy for AMI.
- To provide recommendations for reperfusion strategies based on resource availability.
- To guide management decisions in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of existing evidence.
- Analysis of treatment efficacy and timeliness.
- Development of clinical management guidelines.
Main Results:
- PCI demonstrates superiority over thrombolytic therapy for AMI.
- Transfer for PCI within 90 minutes is recommended if onsite PCI is unavailable.
- If transfer goal exceeds 120 minutes, administer thrombolytic therapy with planned transfer.
- Immediate PCI consideration is advised for cardiogenic shock or recurrent angina.
Conclusions:
- Timely reperfusion is critical in AMI management.
- PCI should be prioritized when feasible and timely.
- Developing integrated STEMI protocols across healthcare systems is essential.
- Further research is needed on combined thrombolytic and PCI strategies.
Abstract:
Review of existing evidence supports that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. If, however, a dedicated intervention team is not available onsite, transfer to another facility should be considered if reperfusion could be achieved within 90 minutes. If that goal cannot be achieved within 120 minutes, thrombolytic therapy should be administered with a planned transfer to a facility with PCI capability. In patients with cardiogenic shock or recurrence of anginal chest pain, PCI should be immediately considered. The value of administering full or modified dose thrombolytic therapy and then transferring for immediate PCI has not been demonstrated yet. Development of dedicated protocols for management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction developed by a community-based emergency medical service, emergency department, and cardiovascular service is highly recommended.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Angina IV: Management