Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A balanced memory network.

Yasser Roudi1, Peter E Latham

  • 1Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom. yasser@gatsby.ucl.ac.uk

Plos Computational Biology
|September 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same author

Lost in Retraining: Closed-Loop Learning and Model Collapse in Exponential Families.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Correction: The role of oscillations in grid cells' toroidal topology.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Brain-wide representations of prior information in mouse decision-making.

Nature·2025
Same author

The role of oscillations in grid cells' toroidal topology.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

The quality and complexity of pairwise maximum entropy models for large cortical populations.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same journal

Systematic design of auxotrophic strains and media conditions to probe metabolic functions in E. coli.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Delayed reward information is underweighted in reinforcement learning with dispersed feedback.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

GHF-ACL: A novel contrastive learning framework with multi-order graph structures for herb-disease association prediction.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

GATE: Adaptive learning with working memory by information gating in multi-lamellar hippocampal formation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating vectors for the design of a spillover-disrupting Lassa virus transmissible vaccine.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

This study explains how neuronal networks achieve working memory by balancing excitation and inhibition. It reveals that irregular neural firing requires large memory representations and network capacity scales with connections.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Neural Networks

Background:

  • Understanding working memory implementation in neuronal networks is a fundamental neuroscience challenge.
  • Attractor networks are the leading theoretical model, but key questions about their function remain.
  • Specifically, how attractor networks produce irregular neural firing and their storage capacity under realistic conditions are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying irregular neural firing in attractor networks.
  • To determine the storage capacity of attractor networks under biologically realistic conditions.
  • To provide a theoretical framework for understanding working memory in neuronal networks.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a three-variable description of attractor networks using mean-field analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Studied a model with balanced inhibition and excitation.
  • Verified theoretical predictions through large-scale simulations of spiking neural networks.
  • Main Results:

    • Irregular neural firing in attractor networks necessitates a large number of neurons per memory representation.
    • The number of storable memories scales directly with the number of excitatory connections in the network.
    • These findings were confirmed via simulations on large spiking neural network models.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides a theoretical and simulation-based explanation for irregular firing in working memory networks.
    • It establishes a clear relationship between network connectivity and memory storage capacity.
    • The derived model offers insights into the biological plausibility and limitations of attractor networks for working memory.