Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the therapeutic misconception.

Franklin G Miller1, Steven Joffe

  • 1Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
|September 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How variants of uncertain significance affect clinical decisions: A systematic review.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Stakeholder views about the responsibilities of principal investigators in multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Response to Sansom et al.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Germline Cancer Predisposition Results From the National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric MATCH Trial.

JCO precision oncology·2025
Same author

The ethics of heritable human genome editing.

Fertility and sterility·2025
Same author

Xenotransplantation: Injustice, Harm, and Alternatives for Addressing the Organ Crisis.

The Hastings Center report·2025
Same journal

Coming to America: Bioethical Training at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and the Establishment of Medical Ethics in Germany.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

A Reply to Bernstein, Jayaram, and Hutler's "Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns".

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Relational Autonomy in Nonideal Medical Decision-Making.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Ambiguous Invitations: Nonmaleficence, Uncertainty Attitudes and Public Health Policy.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Editor's Note, June 2025.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
See all related articles

Participants in clinical trials often confuse research with personal medical care, a phenomenon known as the therapeutic misconception. This study examines its ethical implications and offers recommendations for improving informed consent in clinical research.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Patient Decision-Making

Background:

  • The "therapeutic misconception" describes participants confusing clinical trial research with personalized medical care.
  • Despite its recognition in research ethics, the ethical significance of this misconception remains underexplored.
  • Existing literature often assumes clinical trial participation is inherently disadvantageous compared to standard care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Critically examine the formulation and implications of the therapeutic misconception.
  • Clarify the ethical significance of the therapeutic misconception for patient decision-making.
  • Propose policy recommendations for enhancing informed consent in clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of the "therapeutic misconception" concept.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of assumptions regarding clinical trials versus standard medical care.
  • Review of ethical considerations in patient recruitment for research.

    • Main Results:

    • The therapeutic misconception significantly impacts patient understanding and decision-making processes.
    • Assumptions about disadvantages in clinical trials require nuanced ethical evaluation.
    • Current informed consent procedures may not adequately address the therapeutic misconception.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing the therapeutic misconception is crucial for ethical clinical trial conduct.
    • Enhanced informed consent processes are needed to protect research participants.
    • Further research should explore participant perspectives and improve trial communication strategies.