Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent.

Simon Lacey1, Andrew Peters, K Sathian

  • 1Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multilevel analysis of risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy cows in Plateau State, Nigeria: a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression modelling approach.

BMC veterinary research·2026
Same author

When Timing Matters: Evaluating Temporal Leakage in Machine Learning Models of Football Pass Turnovers.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same author

A Review of the Challenge of Pre-Existing Humoral Immunity in Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy and Potential Solutions.

Human gene therapy·2026
Same author

Correction: Virus-like particle (VLP)-based indirect ELISA (iELISA) for the detection of beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) antibodies.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Virus-like particle (VLP)-based indirect ELISA (iELISA) for the detection of beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) antibodies.

Applied microbiology and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Acoustic parameter combinations underlying mapping of pseudoword sounds to multiple domains of meaning: Representational similarity analyses and machine-learning models.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Object recognition is viewpoint-independent across senses (vision and touch) when using abstract representations. Spatial imagery skills influence this cross-modal recognition, unlike within-modal recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Previous studies indicated viewpoint-dependence in visual and haptic object recognition.
  • This dependence may stem from object orientation affecting surface processing differently across senses.
  • This study re-evaluated object recognition using a z-axis orientation to equalize surface availability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the viewpoint-dependence of cross-modal (vision-touch) and within-modal object recognition.
  • To determine if object orientation affects recognition accuracy differently across sensory modalities.
  • To explore the relationship between spatial imagery and cross-modal object identification.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified novel objects using either vision or touch after initial study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Objects were presented in unrotated and rotated orientations (180° around x, y, z axes).
  • Recognition accuracy was assessed for within-modal and cross-modal identification tasks.

    • Main Results:

    • Rotation impaired within-modal recognition (vision and touch) but not cross-modal recognition.
    • Visual recognition was more affected by rotation around x- and y-axes; haptic recognition was equally affected by all axes.
    • Cross-modal accuracy correlated with spatial imagery scores, but within-modal accuracy did not.

    Conclusions:

    • Cross-modal object identification appears viewpoint-independent, mediated by abstract representations.
    • Spatial transformation abilities, indicated by spatial imagery scores, are linked to constructing these abstract representations.
    • Within-modal viewpoint-dependence differs between vision and touch, possibly due to surface occlusion relevance.