Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Intent to harm or injure? Gender and the expression of anger
1Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom. a.c.campbell@durham.ac.uk
Abstract:
Gender differences in aggressive behaviour but not in anger suggest that women may express anger through behaviours that lack intent to harm or injure. Angry behaviours (injurious and noninjurious) were rated in terms of their likelihood of use when angry (N=888). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a direct aggression factor and two further scales: explosive acts (e.g. throwing objects when alone) and defusing acts (e.g. talking to a third party). Men exceeded women on direct aggression and explosive acts, whereas women exceeded men on defusing acts. Expressive beliefs about aggression (as a loss of self-control) were higher among women and strongly associated with use of defusing acts and the avoidance of direct aggression. Instrumental beliefs about aggression (as a means of control over others) were higher among men and showed the opposite pattern of associations. We highlight the need for further work on actors' intention in relation to angry behaviours and the impact of context on these intentions.
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
Torts II
Emotional Expression
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
Conduct Disorder
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
