Related Experiment Videos
The use of sublaminar cables to replace Luque wires
M N Songer1, D L Spencer, P R Meyer
1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Spine
|August 11, 1991
Summary
A new stainless steel cable system offers a safer alternative to sublaminar wires for spinal stabilization. This flexible cable design reduces neurologic complications and demonstrates superior strength and fatigue resistance compared to traditional wires.
Area of Science:
- Spinal Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Orthopedic Instrumentation
Background:
- Sublaminar wires are used for posterior spinal instrumentation.
- Traditional sublaminar wiring techniques have led to complications like neurologic injury, wire breakage, and dural tears.
- These issues have caused sublaminar wiring to fall into disfavor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel cable system designed to overcome the limitations of sublaminar wires.
- To evaluate the biomechanical properties and clinical efficacy of the new cable system.
Main Methods:
- A cable system with two 49-stranded stainless steel cables and a malleable leader was developed.
- Biomechanical testing included maximum yield strength and fatigue analysis comparing cables to wires.
- Preliminary clinical outcomes were assessed after a mean follow-up of 19 months in 245 patients.
Main Results:
- Stainless steel cables exhibited 2.85-2.94 times greater yield strength than double stainless steel wire loops.
- Fatigue tests showed stainless steel cables withstood 6-22 times more cycles to failure than wires.
- Clinical follow-up revealed no cable breakage or loosening, and no associated complications. Titanium cables showed initial failures due to crimp slipping.
Conclusions:
- The stainless steel cable system demonstrates superior biomechanical strength and fatigue resistance compared to traditional sublaminar wires.
- The flexibility of the cables may reduce neurologic complications by preventing spinal cord contusions during instrumentation.
- Preliminary clinical results are encouraging, suggesting the cable system is a safe and effective alternative for spinal stabilization.