Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Risk-taking and reasons for living in non-clinical Italian university students
Maurizio Pompili1, David Lester, Marco Innamorati
1Department of Psychiatry, Sant'Andrea Hospital, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy, and McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA. maurizio.pompili@uniroma1.it or mpompili@mclean.harvard.edu
Abstract:
The associations between risk-taking, hopelessness, and reasons for living were explored in a sample of 312 Italian students. Respondents completed the Physical Risk Assessment Inventory, the Physical Risk-Taking Behavior Inventory, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Reasons for Living Inventory. Students with lower scores on the Reasons for Living Inventory and higher scores on the Beck Hopelessness Scale rated the risky activities as less risky and engaged in them more often. Women obtained higher scores on risk assessment, lower scores on personal risk-taking and higher scores on the Reasons for Living Inventory and most of its subscales. Men in general and people who take risks and perceive lower risk are more hopeless and relatively weak in reasons for living.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Surveys
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Case Studies
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Cross-Sectional Research