Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Exact statistical inference for group sequential trials.

D Y Lin1, L J Wei, D L DeMets

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Biometrics
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonparametric estimation of the total treatment effect with multiple outcomes in the presence of terminal events.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Checking the Cox Proportional Hazards Model with Interval-Censored Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2025
Same author

Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Interval-Censored Multi-State Data with An Absorbing State.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2025
Same author

Multiancestry Genome-Wide Association Study of Early Childhood Caries.

Journal of dental research·2024
Same author

Maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric regression models with interval-censored multistate data.

Biometrika·2024
Same author

Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in myeloma clinical trials: an evolving paradigm.

Blood cancer journal·2024
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Existing group sequential methods for clinical trials may be inaccurate for small sample sizes. This study introduces exact methods for group sequential testing and interval estimation, offering more reliable analysis in clinical research.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Group sequential methods are used in clinical trials to analyze data periodically.
  • Current methods rely on large-sample approximations, which can be unreliable for smaller trials.
  • These approximations may lead to inaccurate statistical tests and confidence intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of existing group sequential methods in small to moderate-sized clinical trials.
  • To develop and study exact methods for group sequential testing and interval estimation.
  • To provide accurate statistical procedures that accommodate flexible treatment allocation rules.

Main Methods:

  • Extensive numerical simulations were conducted to assess the performance of approximate group sequential methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exact methods for group sequential testing were developed and analyzed.
  • Exact methods for repeated and post-sequential interval estimation were studied.
  • The procedures were designed to be applicable with any treatment allocation rules.

    • Main Results:

    • Approximate group sequential methods can result in inflated test sizes and under-coverage probabilities in small to moderate trials.
    • Exact methods provide accurate statistical inference for group sequential trials.
    • The developed procedures are robust and can handle various treatment allocation schemes.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing approximate group sequential methods are unreliable for small to moderate clinical trials.
    • Exact methods offer a more accurate and reliable approach for group sequential analysis.
    • The proposed exact methods enhance the integrity of clinical trial evaluations, especially with dichotomous outcomes.