Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

07:41
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
Published on: July 30, 2019
Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know?
Phillip B Fenberg1, Kaustuv Roy
1Section of Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116, USA.
Molecular Ecology
|September 18, 2007
Summary
Size-selective harvesting removes large individuals, negatively impacting species' populations and ecology. Current management, often using minimum size limits, fails to address these evolutionary and plastic responses.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Fisheries Science
Background:
- Size-selective harvesting, common in marine and terrestrial ecosystems, preferentially removes larger individuals.
- This practice negatively affects species' demography, life history, and ecological roles, with growing empirical evidence.
- Distinguishing evolutionary responses from phenotypic plasticity in harvested populations remains a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To illustrate the biological consequences of size-selective harvesting using examples from diverse habitats.
- To highlight the limitations of current management strategies, particularly minimum size restrictions.
- To propose future research directions and necessary policy changes for sustainable management.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of empirical studies on size-selective harvesting impacts.
- Analysis of examples from both aquatic and terrestrial environments.
- Discussion of evolutionary and plastic responses to harvesting pressures.
Main Results:
- Size-selective harvesting demonstrably alters species' biological traits and population dynamics.
- Observed changes can result from evolutionary adaptation or phenotypic plasticity, complicating impact assessment.
- Existing management plans often do not adequately account for these complex biological responses.
Conclusions:
- Size-selective harvesting poses significant biological risks that require updated management approaches.
- Future research should focus on differentiating evolutionary and plastic responses to inform conservation.
- Management policies must evolve beyond simple size restrictions to mitigate negative impacts effectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Limits to Natural Selection
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.For one, natural selection can only act upon existing genetic variation. Hypothetically, redtusks may enhance elephant survival by deterring ivory-seeking poachers. However, if there are no gene variants—or alleles—for redtusks, natural selection cannot increase the prevalence of...
Types of Selection
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Conservation of Small Populations
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less likely to...
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Frequency-dependent Selection
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...

