Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Gergely Csibra1

  • 1School of Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom. g.csibra@bbk.ac.uk

Cognition
|September 18, 2007
PubMed

Insights

Infants attribute goals to actions, even inanimate objects, if their behavior varies. This suggests goal attribution in babies isn't solely based on recognizing human-like agents.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Infant Behavior

Background:

  • Human infants often attribute goals to observed actions, offering insights into the origins of goal-directed behavior.
  • Previous research suggested younger infants (6.5 months) might restrict goal attribution to human or humanoid agents.
  • The role of agent identification versus behavioral cues in infant goal attribution remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether 6.5-month-old infants attribute goals to an inanimate object (a box) exhibiting variable behavior.
  • To determine if featural identification of an agent is a prerequisite for goal attribution in young infants.
  • To identify the key behavioral cues influencing infant goal attribution.

Main Methods:

  • Experimentally presented 6.5-month-old infants with a moving inanimate box.
  • The box demonstrated slight variations in its approach to a goal, within the range of efficient actions.
  • Infants' responses and attributions were observed to gauge their understanding of the box's actions.

Main Results:

  • Infants were willing to attribute a goal to the inanimate box when its behavior varied.
  • Featural identification of an agent (human-like appearance) is not necessary for infants to attribute goals.
  • Variability in an agent's behavior emerged as the most critical cue for infants' goal attribution.

Conclusions:

  • Young infants do not require agents to be human-like to attribute goals to their actions.
  • Behavioral variability is a primary driver for infants' teleological interpretations of actions.
  • The innate bias for goal attribution in infants may not solely stem from learned experiences with agents.

More Related Videos

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization05:35

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization

Published on: April 19, 2017

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants11:14

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
Attribution01:26

Attribution

In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...