Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lateralization of facial processing: a spatial frequency model.

R D Whitman1, J F Keegan

  • 1Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

The International Journal of Neuroscience
|October 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Right hemisphere, white-matter learning disabilities associated with depression in an adolescent and young adult psychiatric population.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·1998
Same author

Memory deficits and industrial toxicant exposure: a comparative study of hard metal, solvent and asbestos workers.

The International journal of neuroscience·1997
Same author

The utility of novelty seeking, harm avoidance, and expectancy in the prediction of drinking.

Addictive behaviors·1997
Same author

Facial recognition in hypothetically schizotypic college students. The role of generalized poor performance.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·1994
Same author

Neuropsychological sequelae of hard metal disease.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·1993
Same author

Efferent gating of human auditory attentional processes.

The International journal of neuroscience·1991
Same journal

Thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for patients undergoing minimally invasive vertebroplasty: effects on pain and lumbar function.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Recurrence associated IGFBP2 promotes malignant progression and epithelial mesenchymal transition in glioma cells via the AKT mTOR pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Decreased miR-1305 expression is associated with tumour invasiveness and poor prognosis in glioma patients.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Astaxanthin alleviates ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Clinical efficacy of cryopreserved autologous bone flaps versus titanium plates for cranioplasty: a retrospective comparative study.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Sericin improves diabetic cognitive impairment in rats by inhibiting TXNIP/NLRP3 neuroinflammation through SIRT1.

The International journal of neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Visual processing of faces differs between brain hemispheres. The left visual field showed faster reaction times and fewer errors for low spatial frequency face stimuli, suggesting hemispheric lateralization in facial recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Facial recognition is a complex cognitive process.
  • Hemispheric lateralization influences various brain functions, including visual processing.
  • Spatial frequency components are crucial for visual perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of spatial frequency in visual field differences for face processing.
  • To examine hemispheric lateralization in the perception of faces based on spatial frequency.
  • To determine if visual field asymmetry affects face matching accuracy and reaction time.

Main Methods:

  • Faces were filtered for high or low spatial frequency components.
  • Stimuli were presented tachistoscopically to either the right or left visual fields.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed a face matching task, with errors and reaction times recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • The right visual field presentations resulted in more errors, particularly for low spatial frequency stimuli.
    • Left visual field presentations of low spatial frequency stimuli yielded the fastest reaction times.
    • Left visual field, low spatial frequency stimuli also showed the lowest error rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant processing differences exist between visual fields for face perception.
    • Low spatial frequency information is processed more efficiently in the left visual field.
    • These findings support hemispheric lateralization mechanisms in facial recognition.