Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Commentary: maintaining the somatic/germ-line distinction: some ethical drawbacks.

R Moseley1

  • 1Department of Community Health & Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study questions the ethical relevance of distinguishing between somatic and germ-line genetic modifications. It explores challenges to the idea that somatic cell therapy is acceptable while germ-line therapy is not.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-frequency rTMS to the parietal lobe increases eye-movement carryover and decreases hazard rating.

Neuropsychologia·2021
Same author

'Young' oral fibroblasts are geno/phenotypically distinct.

Journal of dental research·2010
Same author

Investigation of the potential of polymer therapeutics in corneal re-epithelialisation.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2010
Same author

Increased oral fibroblast lifespan is telomerase-independent.

Journal of dental research·2009
Same author

Optimisation of the hydrogen peroxide pre-treatment of titanium: surface characterisation and protein adsorption.

Clinical oral implants research·2008
Same author

Effect of margin status on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence following LLETZ in women over 50 years.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2008

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Human Genetics
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Ethical evaluations of genetic therapy often use distinctions to separate acceptable treatments from those altering future generations.
  • A common distinction proposes somatic cell genetic modification as ethically permissible, contrasting with ethically objectionable germ-line genetic modification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the ethical relevance of the distinction between somatic and germ-line genetic modifications.
  • To identify and analyze significant challenges to this widely accepted ethical framework.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of ethical distinctions in genetic therapy.
  • Critical examination of the somatic/germ-line dichotomy in bioethical discourse.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The paper identifies several serious difficulties that undermine the ethical relevance of the somatic/germ-line distinction.
  • These difficulties suggest that the proposed separation may not be as ethically robust as commonly assumed.

Conclusions:

  • The ethical acceptability of genetic therapy cannot be solely determined by the somatic/germ-line distinction.
  • Further ethical deliberation is required, moving beyond this simplistic dichotomy to address the complexities of genetic interventions.