Related Experiment Videos
[Optimal nutritional status assessment parameters in gastroenterological patients on hospital admission]
Branka Roganovićk1, Sasa Perić, Dino Tarabar
1Vojonomedicinska akademija, Klinika za gastroenterologiju i hepatologiju, Crnotravska 17, 11 040 Beograd, Srbija.
Background/Aim:
There are no recommendations for the optimal nutritional status assessment parameters (NSAPs) in the current literature. The aim of this study was to define the optimal NSAPs for nutritional status assessing in gastroenterological patients on hospital admission.
Methods:
Nutritional status of 612 gastroenterological patients was evaluated at the admission using 6 NSAPs: unintentional weight loss (WL), body mass index (BMI), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), serum albumin concentration (ALB), and lymphocyte counts (LYM). According to their nutritive status, the patients were classified as well nourished (normally nourished and obese), moderately undernourished and severely undernourished. Based on the similarities and differences in the assessment results, obtained according to each of 6 parameters, the optimal nutritional assessment parameters were defined, separately for the well-nourished/undernourished patients and for moderately/severely undernourished patients.
Results:
The incidence of malnutrition was in the range 5.9-29.7%. The results based on MAMC, ALB, and LYM were similar (25.2-29.7%; p > 0.05), while the results based on WL, BMI, and TSF differed significantly (5.9-19.9%; p = 0.001-0.015). The assessment based on BMI was the most severe criterion, while the assessment according to MAMC was the mildest criterion in selection of malnourished patients. The assessment according to MAMC was the mildest criterion for the selection of severe malnourished patients (severely malnouorished patients accounted for 70.1%), while BMI and LYM were the most severe criteria (severely malnouorished patients accounted for 22.2% and 27.3%, respectively). The results based on BMI and LYM were similar (Wilcoxon test; p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Combining BMI with MAMC is sufficient for the assessment of the nutritional status of gastroenterological patients on admission, as well as for differentiation between severely malnourished and moderately malnourished patients.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...