Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Lateral Molar Approach-Driven Transoral Endoscopic Procedure for Benign Infratemporal Fossa Tumor Resection
Published on: August 15, 2025
Patient and surgeon experience with the endotine forehead device for brow and forehead lift
Sharmin Chowdhury1, Raman Malhotra, Roger Smith
1Corneo Plastic Unit, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, United Kingdom.
Purpose:
: To report our experience with the Endotine forehead fixation device (Coapt Systems, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.), a bioabsorbable fixation method for forehead and brow lift.
Methods:
: Retrospective noncomparative case series of 31 patients who underwent forehead and brow lift surgery using the Endotine device in a single center during a 12-month period from 2004 to 2005.
Results:
A mean brow lift of 2.8 mm (SD, 0.2-7.1 mm) was achieved. There were no cases of recurrence during the follow-up period of 4 months to 22 months. Problems encountered included palpability, tenderness, and numbness. In the majority of cases, these symptoms resolved within a few months and were not troublesome to the patient. Other problems included visible lumps, device mobility, and exacerbation of a high hairline. Patient satisfaction was high, with 95.3% of patients saying they were either happy or very happy with the results; 81% of patients said they would recommend the Endotine as a method of fixation. All surgeons were pleased by the lift achieved and felt the device was easy to use. Problems reported by the surgeons included 1 dislocated device, discomfort, palpability beyond 15 months, a lack of lateral compared with central lift, and cost. Two of the 3 surgeons are still using the Endotine device as the preferred method of fixation.
Conclusions:
: The Endotine device is effective, safe, and easy to use, and has high patient satisfaction. Problems included numbness, tenderness, and palpability. A preference for other fixation methods was indicated by some because of cost, length of surgery, and the amount of lift achieved.
