Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Goal attainment scaling: current methodological challenges.

Alan Tennant1

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, UK. a.tennant@leeds.ac.uk

Disability and Rehabilitation
|September 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Turkish adaptation and psychometric testing of the Perceived Workplace Support Scale in people with inflammatory arthritis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026
Same author

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Turkish Version of the Workplace Activity Limitations Scale (WALS) in people with inflammatory arthritis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026
Same author

Fatigue prevalence, interactions with associated symptoms and longitudinal changes in those with multiple sclerosis: Insights from the TONiC study.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026
Same author

Translation, validity and reliability of the Turkish Chronic Illness Job Strain Scale (CIJSS) in people with inflammatory arthritis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026
Same author

Employment status in people with multiple sclerosis: Profile, dynamic changes and determinants over time.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2025
Same author

EQ-5D-5L in Multiple Sclerosis: Estimated Utility Values, Minimal (Clinically) Important Changes, and Direct and Indirect Influences Over Time.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2025
Same journal

Optimising access to the New South Wales Mid North Coast Brain Injury Service for local aboriginal people (Dunghutti Muri project): a participatory action research study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Egyptian-Arabic version of ABILHAND-Kids questionnaire: a cross-cultural study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Patient's perspectives on the value of peer support after acquired brain injury: an exploratory study.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Aligning interprofessional collaboration in sick leave and return-to-work guidance: development of the ICF-based WARD instrument and guideline.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Effects of non-invasive therapies for the treatment of phantom limb pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same journal

Understanding patients' experiences and needs around decision-making for bulbar symptom management at a multidisciplinary ALS clinic.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
See all related articles

Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) mathematical validation reveals over 14% of cases show clinically significant differences between ordinal and linear scores. Non-linearity issues, especially at score margins, challenge patient-centered outcome measurement.

Area of Science:

  • Health outcomes research
  • Measurement in healthcare
  • Patient-centered outcomes

Background:

  • Patient-centered outcome measures are crucial for personalized medicine.
  • Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a patient-generated index used to measure outcomes.
  • Challenges exist in mathematically validating patient-centered outcome measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the mathematical process of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS).
  • To illustrate problems with patient-generated indexes in measuring patient-centered outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated data representing GAS input were analyzed.
  • Rasch analysis was employed to linearize response categories.
  • The Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) was used to assess score discrepancies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Over 14% of simulated cases exhibited score differences greater than the MCID between ordinal and linear GAS.
  • Discrepancies were most pronounced at the score range margins due to non-linearity.
  • The GAS process demonstrated mathematical limitations, including issues with multiplication.

Conclusions:

  • Patient-centered approaches like GAS face significant scientific validation challenges.
  • Suggestions include pre-calibrating goals onto a unidimensional metric using 'item banks'.
  • Linearized scores could potentially improve GAS applications and overcome current limitations.