Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Divorce--a Gordian knot.

B F Nordhaus1

  • 1Yale Child Study Center.

The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study applies psychoanalytic and child development theories to a child visitation case. The recommendation supports sole custodial authority for regulating visits, prioritizing the child

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Foster placement.

Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America·1999
Same author

Best interests of the child in the family and community. Social, legal, and medical implications for pediatricians.

Pediatric clinics of North America·1995
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Child Psychology
  • Psychoanalytic Theory
  • Legal Psychology

Background:

  • Court-ordered visitation disputes necessitate theoretical frameworks for child welfare.
  • Understanding child development is crucial in legal evaluations.

Observation:

  • A 6-year-old child's visitation arrangement was evaluated using psychoanalytic and child development principles.
  • The study focused on the interaction between the child and custodial/noncustodial parents.

Findings:

  • The primary recommendation is to grant the sole custodial parent authority over visitation.
  • This approach aligns with the legal principle of the least detrimental alternative.

Implications:

  • This case highlights the integration of psychological theories in legal decision-making.
  • The findings suggest a model for resolving child visitation disputes prioritizing child well-being.