Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modality and domain specific components in auditory and visual working memory tasks.

Günther Lehnert1, Hubert D Zimmer

  • 1Brain and Cognition Unit, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. g.lehnert@mx.uni-saarland.de

Cognitive Processing
|September 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enactment and bizarreness modulate familiarity and recollection in associative recognition: Evidence from FN400 and LPC.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Task Demands Differentially Affect Processing of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Object Features in Working Memory.

Experimental psychology·2023
Same author

Unitization of internal and external features contributes to associative recognition for faces: Evidence from modulations of the FN400.

Brain research·2020
Same author

Visual Working Memory of Chinese Characters and Expertise: The Expert's Memory Advantage Is Based on Long-Term Knowledge of Visual Word Forms.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

Spatio-Temporal Neural Changes After Task-Switching Training in Old Age.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2019
Same author

Is the Correlation between Storage Capacity and Matrix Reasoning Driven by the Storage of Partial Solutions? A Pilot Study of an Experimental Approach.

Journal of Intelligence·2019
Same journal

The STEARC effect revisited: does time shape spatial attention and memory?

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Higher- and lower-level processing in strategic reading: Reconceptualising the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS).

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

More caution or more lenient: deciphering the role of negative affect in recognition and inference.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Cognitive offloading, critical thinking and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT: a comparative study of artificial intelligence-assisted and manual task performance in young adults.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

Emojis vs. black-and-white and colored drawings: comparing living and non-living things in oral naming.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same journal

The impact of facial expressions on space- and object-based attention by gaze cues.

Cognitive processing·2026
See all related articles

This study explores how the brain processes spatial information in working memory (WM) across different senses. Findings suggest object appearance is sense-specific, while spatial WM and object-location binding use general brain processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Working Memory Research

Background:

  • The tripartite model of working memory (WM) includes the visuo-spatial sketchpad (VSSP) for non-verbal content.
  • The VSSP is divided into visual object and spatial processing, distinguishing appearance from location.
  • The processing of auditory spatial information within this framework remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how auditory spatial information is processed in working memory.
  • To compare auditory and visual spatial working memory.
  • To determine the modality specificity of object appearance, spatial WM, and object-location binding.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of behavioral and neurophysiological findings from visual and auditory spatial working memory studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing literature on cross-modal spatial processing.

    • Main Results:

    • Evidence supports distinct processing domains for object appearance and spatial information in auditory WM.
    • Auditory and visual spatial working memory share modality-general processes.
    • Object appearance processing appears to be modality-specific.

    Conclusions:

    • The modality-specific processing of object appearance is proposed.
    • Spatial working memory and object-location binding are suggested to rely on modality-general mechanisms.
    • This extends the understanding of the VSSP to include auditory spatial information processing.