Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Morphological and biomechanical aspects of vulnerable coronary plaque
1Department of Hemodynamics and Interventional Cardiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Claude Bernard University, Lyon 1; INSERM Unit E886, 69394 Lyon, France. gerard.finet@creatis.univ-lyon1.fr
Insights
Vulnerable plaque rupture is complex, involving inflammation, geometry, composition, and hemodynamics. Predicting rupture from imaging alone is difficult due to multifactorial influences and sensitivity to initial conditions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Biomechanics
- Pathology
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Vulnerable plaque morphology is inadequately explained by gross pathology and intravascular ultrasound alone.
- Plaque vulnerability is multifactorial, encompassing inflammatory, geometric, compositional, and hemodynamic factors.
- Biomechanical principles are crucial for understanding plaque rupture dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the biomechanical underpinnings of vulnerable plaque rupture.
- To elucidate the role of plaque geometry, composition, and hemodynamic stress in rupture.
- To assess the limitations of current diagnostic imaging in predicting plaque rupture.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of plaque evolution and morphological features.
- Investigation of stress concentration at juxta-luminal locations.
- Numerical simulation of arterial remodeling and stress distribution.
- Consideration of biomechanical factors like heart rate and blood pressure.
Main Results:
- Eccentric plaque morphology concentrates stress, potentially exceeding collagen's rupture threshold.
- Lipid core size and fibrous cap thickness significantly influence stress concentration; rupture occurs below 65 microns cap thickness.
- Positive arterial remodeling, driven by healthy arc stretching, maintains lumen area up to 40-50% plaque burden.
- Hemodynamic factors like blood pressure increase stress and material fatigue in arterial walls.
Conclusions:
- Vulnerable plaque rupture is a complex, multifactorial event.
- Predicting individual plaque rupture from diagnostic imagery is challenging due to inherent complexities and sensitivity to initial conditions.
- Current imaging provides only morphological data, limiting predictive accuracy for plaque rupture.
Abstract:
Vulnerable plaque morphology has been described by gross pathology and intravascular ultrasound, but morphological criteria cannot fully explain vulnerability, which involves four distinct factors: 1) inflammatory and biological processes; 2) geometry; 3) composition; and 4) hemodynamic stress. These last three aspects underlie the biomechanical study of vulnerable plaque. By virtue of the nature of their evolution, atherosclerotic plaques tend to be excentric, and this is a crucial morphological feature, causing circumferential stress to peak in very specific juxta-luminal locations, where it can exceed the rupture threshold of collagen, the basic constituent of arterial architecture. The lipido-necrotic core covered by a fibrous cap, formed in young plaques, is another morphological feature, which, can also increase and concentrate circumference stress in the juxta-luminal fibrous cap. The larger the lipid core, the thinner the fibrous cap and the greater is the stress. There are also inflammatory processes in such areas, which tend to reduce cap thickness. Ruptures occur when this thickness falls below 65 microns. Heart rate, blood pressure and pulse pressure are all biomechanical factors affecting vulnerable arterial walls, increasing circumferential stress and material fatigue. Vulnerable plaques are almost always associated with positive arterial remodeling. Numerical simulation has shown such so-called compensatory remodeling to be exclusively due to the healthy arc stretching in vulnerable plaques. Positive remodeling is optimal when the healthy arc is around 170 degrees, which keeps the lumen area relatively stable as long as the plaque does not exceed 40% to 50%. This mechanism does not apply to concentric plaques. In conclusion, the mechanism of vulnerable plaque rupture is highly complex and multifactorial. This complexity more or less precludes prediction in individual cases: we are in the realms of chaos theory and acute sensitivity to initial conditions. The greatest caution is therefore required in any attempt to predict rupture from diagnostic imagery, which provides only morphological data on plaque's nature.
More Related Videos
06:18Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
09:09Single Nuclei Isolation from Coronary Endarterectomy Tissue of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations