Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Knowledge-based commissioning.

J A Muir Gray1

  • 1National Knowledge Service, UK National Health Service, Oxford. muir.gray@dphpc.ox.ac.uk

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery : Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
|November 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to above Commentaries and Letters by the authors of "The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice".

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2020
Same author

The 1960s cervical screening incident at National Women's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand: insights for screening research, policy making, and practice.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2020
Same author

English lessons: can publishing an atlas of variation stimulate the discussion on appropriateness of care?

The Medical journal of Australia·2016
Same author

The shift to personalised and population medicine.

Lancet (London, England)·2013
Same author

Better value eye care for the 21st century: the population approach.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2013
Same author

Geographical variation in certification rates of blindness and sight impairment in England, 2008-2009.

BMJ open·2012
Same journal

Gender-Affirming Care in Otolaryngology: A State of the Art Review.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same journal

Caffeine Consumption and Rhinologic Symptom Severity.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same journal

Ethical Considerations in Using the Pernkopf Atlas in Otolaryngology Education Ethics in Practice: Point-Counterpoint.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same journal

Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Recurrence in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer After Transoral Robotic Surgery.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same journal

PEAK-II Trach: A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement/Simulation Study Assessing Pediatric Emergency Readiness.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same journal

Clinical Features, Treatment, and Outcomes for Oropharyngeal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
See all related articles

Healthcare resource allocation requires maximizing value, especially with limited budgets. Different stakeholders have varying values, and subjective beliefs can sometimes influence decisions more than objective evidence.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Healthcare Management
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Healthcare systems face finite budgets, necessitating strategic resource allocation.
  • Maximizing value is a key objective for healthcare payers and providers.
  • Diverse stakeholder values (payer, provider, clinician, patient) complicate resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the concept of value in healthcare resource allocation.
  • To highlight the divergence of values among different healthcare stakeholders.
  • To underscore the interplay between objective evidence and subjective values in healthcare decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of healthcare value and resource allocation principles.
  • Discussion of stakeholder perspectives in healthcare decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the role of evidence versus subjective values in policy.

    • Main Results:

    • Value maximization is central to healthcare resource allocation under budget constraints.
    • Innovations offering higher value are expected to displace lower-value interventions.
    • Significant differences exist in the values held by payers, providers, clinicians, and patients.
    • Subjective values can, at times, supersede objective evidence in healthcare commissioning.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare systems must prioritize value in resource allocation to ensure sustainability.
    • Understanding and navigating diverse stakeholder values is crucial for effective healthcare management.
    • Evidence-based decision-making should be balanced with an awareness of the influence of subjective values.