Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial
Matthew J Holcomb1, Kristine M Jacquin
1Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, USA.
Abstract:
A mock child sexual abuse trial was used to study juror perceptions of child eyewitnesses. The child's age (5, 11, or 16) and level of involvement (victim or bystander) were varied across conditions in order to test their impact on juror perceptions and verdict. Results indicated a significant effect of level of involvement on the verdict; defendants in trials involving a bystander witness received higher guilt ratings than defendants in trials with a victim-witness. In addition, jurors perceived the child's eyewitness testimony to be more believable when the child was younger. Implications for the impact of these findings on real-life child sexual abuse cases are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Confirmation Biases
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Traumatic Memory
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

