Vulnerable plaque versus vulnerable patient: emerging blood biomarkers for risk stratification

J A Páramo1, J A Rodríguez, J Orbe

  • 1Atherosclerosis Research, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Avda Pio XII 55 31008 Pamplona, Spain. japaramo@unav.es

Insights

Biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), can help predict cardiovascular event risk. A multimarker approach may offer superior cardiovascular risk assessment compared to single markers.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Cardiology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Biomarkers are crucial for diagnosing and predicting disease, reflecting underlying pathological processes.
  • For coronary heart disease, biomarkers must represent the vascular wall's biology, particularly atherosclerosis.
  • Clinical utility hinges on accuracy, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and widespread applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the potential clinical utility of various biomarkers for cardiovascular disease risk prediction.
  • To investigate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) and its interaction with matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).
  • To assess the value of inflammatory markers in refining cardiovascular risk prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Accumulation of data on markers of inflammation, hemostasis, thrombosis, phospholipases, proteolysis, and oxidative stress.
  • Specific investigation into C-reactive protein (CRP) and its effect on endothelial metalloproteinases (MMPs).
  • Evaluation of the potential of circulating inflammatory markers to improve risk prediction models.

Main Results:

  • C-reactive protein (CRP) is identified as a potential biomarker for primary prevention.
  • CRP was found to enhance the endothelial expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs).
  • Circulating inflammatory markers show potential for refining cardiovascular event risk prediction.

Conclusions:

  • While inflammatory markers like CRP show promise in refining cardiovascular risk prediction, their addition to current scores requires careful evaluation of benefits and costs.
  • A multimarker strategy, combining inflammatory and non-invasive risk markers, may be more effective than single-marker assessment for cardiovascular risk estimation.