Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Echocardiographic and hemodynamic determinants of right coronary artery flow reserve and phasic flow pattern in
Pedro Graziosi1, Barbara Ianni, Expedito Ribeiro
1Heart Institute (InCor) - University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Clinical Division, Sao Paulo, Brazil. graziosi@attglobal.net
Insights
Right coronary artery (RCA) flow patterns and flow reserve (CFR) in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NIC) are not affected by right-sided cardiac disturbances. RCA CFR remains similar to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in advanced NIC patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
Background:
- Right-sided cardiac disturbances in advanced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NIC) have prognostic implications.
- Right coronary artery (RCA) flow patterns and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in NIC are not well understood.
- Investigating RCA hemodynamics in NIC can provide crucial insights into disease mechanisms and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess RCA phasic flow pattern and CFR in advanced NIC patients.
- To compare RCA flow characteristics with the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD).
- To investigate correlations between cardiac structural, mechanical, hemodynamic parameters and RCA flow patterns or CFR.
Main Methods:
- Non-invasive evaluation (echocardiography) and cardiac catheterization in 24 severe NIC patients.
- Intracoronary Doppler (Flowire) assessment of RCA and LAD flow before and after adenosine.
- Comparison of RCA flow patterns and CFR between subgroups with and without pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, and with LAD.
Main Results:
- Resting RCA phasic flow pattern showed no significant difference in subgroups with or without pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction.
- RCA phasic flow pattern was significantly lower than LAD (1.35 vs. 2.85, p < 0.001).
- No significant correlation was found between cardiac mechanical/hemodynamic parameters and RCA-CFR or RCA flow pattern. RCA-CFR was similar to LAD (3.38 vs. 3.34, p = NS).
Conclusions:
- In advanced NIC, RCA exhibits a mild diastolic predominance in flow pattern, less pronounced than LAD.
- Pulmonary artery hypertension and RV dysfunction do not significantly affect RCA flow pattern or CFR.
- RCA flow reserve is comparable to LAD, irrespective of right-sided cardiac disturbances in advanced NIC.
Background:
In patients with advanced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NIC), right-sided cardiac disturbances has prognostic implications. Right coronary artery (RCA) flow pattern and flow reserve (CFR) are not well known in this setting. The purpose of this study was to assess, in human advanced NIC, the RCA phasic flow pattern and CFR, also under right-sided cardiac disturbances, and compare with left coronary circulation. As well as to investigate any correlation between the cardiac structural, mechanical and hemodynamic parameters with RCA phasic flow pattern or CFR.
Methods:
Twenty four patients with dilated severe NIC were evaluated non-invasively, even by echocardiography, and also by cardiac catheterization, inclusive with Swan-Ganz catheter. Intracoronary Doppler (Flowire) data was obtained in RCA and left anterior descendent coronary artery (LAD) before and after adenosine. Resting RCA phasic pattern (diastolic/systolic) was compared between subgroups with and without pulmonary hypertension, and with and without right ventricular (RV) dysfunction; and also with LAD. RCA-CFR was compared with LAD, as well as in those subgroups. Pearson's correlation analysis was accomplished among echocardiographic (including LV fractional shortening, mass index, end systolic wall stress) more hemodynamic parameters with RCA phasic flow pattern or RCA-CFR.
Results:
LV fractional shortening and end diastolic diameter were 15.3 +/- 3.5 % and 69.4 +/- 12.2 mm. Resting RCA phasic pattern had no difference comparing subgroups with vs. without pulmonary hypertension (1.45 vs. 1.29, p = NS) either with vs. without RV dysfunction (1.47 vs. 1.23, p = NS); RCA vs. LAD was 1.35 vs. 2.85 (p < 0.001). It had no significant correlation among any cardiac mechanical or hemodynamic parameter with RCA-CFR or RCA flow pattern. RCA-CFR had no difference compared with LAD (3.38 vs. 3.34, p = NS), as well as in pulmonary hypertension (3.09 vs. 3.10, p = NS) either in RV dysfunction (3.06 vs. 3.22, p = NS) subgroups.
Conclusion:
In patients with chronic advanced NIC, RCA phasic flow pattern has a mild diastolic predominance, less marked than in LAD, with no effects from pulmonary artery hypertension or RV dysfunction. There is no significant correlation between any cardiac mechanical-structural or hemodynamic parameter with RCA-CFR or RCA phasic flow pattern. RCA flow reserve is still similar to LAD, independently of those right-sided cardiac disturbances.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
