Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On using ethical theories to teach engineering ethics.

Mathieu Bouville1

  • 1Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Singapore, 117602, Singapore. m-bouville@imre.a-star.edu.sg

Science and Engineering Ethics
|September 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plagiarism: words and ideas.

Science and engineering ethics·2008
Same author

Is diversity good? Six possible conceptions of diversity and six possible answers.

Science and engineering ethics·2007
Same author

On enrolling more female students in science and engineering.

Science and engineering ethics·2007
Same author

Grain-boundary grooving and agglomeration of alloy thin films with a slow-diffusing species.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

Fermentation kinetics including product and substrate inhibitions plus biomass death: a mathematical analysis.

Biotechnology letters·2007
Same author

Interplay between diffusive and displacive phase transformations: time-temperature-transformation diagrams and microstructures.

Physical review letters·2006
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Engineering ethics education faces challenges with traditional theories like utilitarianism and Kantianism. Clarifying theory application and avoiding misrepresentations can improve moral reasoning skills for students.

Area of Science:

  • Engineering Ethics
  • Moral Philosophy

Background:

  • Engineering ethics education often relies on established philosophical theories.
  • These theories, such as utilitarianism and Kantianism, present pedagogical difficulties in application.
  • Current approaches may misrepresent or underestimate the drawbacks of these ethical frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the challenges of using ethical theories in engineering ethics education.
  • To critically evaluate the common pedagogical practices and assumptions in engineering ethics textbooks.
  • To propose a more productive approach for teaching moral reasoning in engineering.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of prominent ethical theories used in engineering ethics.
  • Examination of common textbook approaches and their underlying assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual framework development for improved moral reasoning instruction.

    • Main Results:

    • The status and application of ethical theories in engineering ethics are often unclear.
    • Textbooks frequently misrepresent theories or falsely argue against self-interest.
    • Underestimation of ethical theory drawbacks hinders effective moral reasoning development.

    Conclusions:

    • Rethinking the presentation of ethical theories is crucial for engineering ethics education.
    • Highlighting theoretical disagreements can foster better problem framing (e.g., motive-consequence, society-individual).
    • A more nuanced approach can enhance students' ability to navigate complex ethical dilemmas in engineering.