Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Metal-metal hip resurfacing: solution to a nonexistent problem.

Michael E Berend1, Todd Bertrand

  • 1Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, Joint Replacement Surgeons of Indiana Research Foundation, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1199 Hadley Rd, Mooresville, IN 46158, USA.

Orthopedics
|September 29, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare a Mobile Bearing Cementless and Cemented Unicompartmental Knee: Results of an Investigational Device Exemption Study in the United States.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

The mobile bearing prosthesis: How to know when it's right for my patient and tips for surgical success.

Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine·2024
Same author

Low Rate of Early Periprosthetic Fractures in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Triple-Tapered Wedge Stem.

Surgical technology international·2024
Same author

What Role Does Patello-Femoral Joint Degeneration Have on Pain and Function After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2023
Same author

Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain and Functional Difficulty in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort Following Total Knee Arthroplasty With Selective Patellar Resurfacing.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2023
Same author

Closing the Distance Between Access and Expertise in Patients with Bone Sarcomas: Is There a Feasible Path Forward?: Commentary on an article by Tomohiro Fujiwara, MD, PhD, et al.: "Geographic Access to High-Volume Care Providers and Survival in Patients with Bone Sarcomas. Nationwide Patterns in the United States".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2022
Same journal

Preoperative Copper-to-Zinc Ratio and Postoperative Delirium After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Supracondylar Distal Femur Fracture Fixation: Early Experiences Comparing the Retrograde Nail With Locking Attachment Washer (LAW) Plate to Traditional Fixation Techniques.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Intra-Articular Vancomycin Powder in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Limb Salvage Versus Amputation for the Management of Primary Bone Tumors of the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

A Modified Keshishyan Index Demonstrates Three-dimensional Assessment of Asymmetry in Pediatric Pelvic Fractures.

Orthopedics·2026
Same journal

Planned Versus Intraoperative Vascular Surgery Consultations in Orthopedic Oncology.

Orthopedics·2026
See all related articles

Second-decade survivorship for hip resurfacing is less predictable than traditional total hip arthroplasty (THA). Current evidence suggests THA with large-head metal-on-metal articulation remains a reliable solution for hip replacement surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Arthroplasty Research

Background:

  • Hip resurfacing arthroplasty presents unique challenges compared to traditional total hip arthroplasty (THA).
  • Predicting long-term outcomes, specifically second-decade survivorship, remains an area of concern for hip resurfacing.
  • Surgical technique and patient selection are critical factors influencing hip resurfacing success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictability of second-decade survivorship for total hip resurfacing.
  • To compare the surgical complexity and reliability of hip resurfacing versus large-head metal-on-metal THA.
  • To discuss the evolving risks and benefits of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of survivorship data for hip resurfacing and THA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of surgical requirements and technical difficulties associated with hip resurfacing.
  • Discussion of clinical outcomes and potential future risks associated with hip resurfacing.

    • Main Results:

    • Second-decade survivorship for hip resurfacing appears less predictable than for THA.
    • Hip resurfacing necessitates greater surgical exposure and is more challenging to perform reliably.
    • The long-term implications and potential new risks of hip resurfacing are not fully understood.

    Conclusions:

    • Conventional THA with large-head metal-on-metal articulation demonstrates reliable clinical performance.
    • Current evidence supports prioritizing THA for addressing significant clinical problems in hip replacement.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the long-term outcomes and safety profile of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.