Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
[Mandibular asymmetry in plagiocephaly without synostosis]
C Baumler1, N Leboucq, G Captier
1Service de chirurgie plastique pédiatrique, CHU de Montpellier, hôpital Lapeyronie, 191, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Subject:
The number of plagiocephalies without synostosis (PWS) strongly increased in the last decade. Its impact on the mandible remains badly understood, the more so as there are various forms of PSS. The purpose of this study was to analyze mandible deformation according to the deformation of PWS.
Material And Methods:
The study was carried out retrospectively starting from three-dimensional scans of children presenting with a PWS. They were classified in 2 groups according to the deformation of the cranium. There were 51 frontal plagiocephalies (PF) and 19 occipital plagiocephalies (PO) for which the cephalic index was calculated. The position of the mandible compared to the base of cranium and its intrinsic asymmetry were analyzed (paired parametric Student test).
Results:
The mandible was symmetrical in PO whereas it was asymmetrical for PF. This asymmetry was present at the level of the corpus and developed in 2 ways: that is to say asymmetry compensated for that of the base of the cranium (68.6%); or it worsened it (23.5%). The degree of brachycephaly was more important in PO than the PF with a cranial index of 0.93+/-0.07 and 0.85+/-0.07 respectively (P<0.05). In both cases the position of the mandibular condyle followed the asymmetry of the base of cranium and the asymmetry of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) was secondary with that of the base of cranium.
Discussion:
In addition to the asymmetry of TMJ position there was an intrinsic mandibular asymmetry in PF which was not found in PO. This asymmetry of the mandible was variable but in most cases it tended to compensate for the asymmetry of the base of the cranium which was more important in PF. The risk to have asymmetry of dental occlusion seems more important in PF than in PO, and an orthodontic follow-up appeared to be justified for these children.
More Related Videos
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
10:42A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
01:22Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
01:27Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
01:14Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...