Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcome of open Tenckhoff catheter insertions: 5 years experience in a major tertiary centre in central Saudi Arabia.

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC·2014
Same author

Role of postoperative antibiotics after appendectomy in non-perforated appendicitis.

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP·2012
Same author

Management of appendiceal abscess. A 10-year experience in Central Saudi Arabia.

Saudi medical journal·2012
Same author

Cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiogram in gallstone pancreatitis.

Saudi medical journal·2011
Same author

Abdominal wall abscess following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an unusual late complication of lost gallstones.

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP·2010
Same author

Extensive retroperitoneal hematoma in blunt trauma.

Saudi medical journal·2010
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

Excision with or without primary closure for pilonidal sinus disease.

Saleh M Al-Salamah1, Muhammad Ibrar Hussain, Shaukat Mahmood Mirza

  • 1Department of General Surgery, King Saud University Unit, Riyadh Medical Complex, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
|October 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Excision with primary closure offers faster healing and return to work for chronic pilonidal sinus (PNS) disease compared to open wounds. Recurrence rates remain comparable between the two surgical methods.

More Related Videos

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Management
  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Wound Healing

Background:

  • Chronic pilonidal sinus disease (PNS) presents a significant management challenge.
  • Surgical intervention is the primary treatment modality for PNS.
  • The optimal surgical technique, specifically regarding wound closure, remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of excision with primary closure versus excision without closure for chronic PNS.
  • To evaluate key metrics including wound infection, healing time, time off work, and recurrence rates.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized trial involving 380 patients with chronic PNS disease was conducted.
  • Patients were assigned to either excision with midline closure (EMC) or excision without closure (EWC).
  • Exclusion criteria included patients presenting with acute pilonidal abscess.

Main Results:

  • The EMC group demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stays, mean healing times, and time off work compared to the EWC group.
  • Wound infection rates were 4.2% for EMC and 3.12% for EWC.
  • No statistically significant difference in recurrence rates was observed between the two groups (3.7% vs. 3%).

Conclusions:

  • Excision and primary closure (EMC) is recommended as a preferred method for managing chronic PNS disease.
  • EMC offers advantages of early wound healing and a faster return to work.
  • The recurrence rates are comparable to excision without closure (EWC).