Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple systems of category learning.

Edward E Smith¹, Murray Grossman

¹Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, MC 5501, New York, NY 10027, USA. eesmith@psych.columbia.edu <eesmith@psych.columbia.edu>

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

|October 2, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of an educational conference for persons affected by hereditary frontotemporal degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

PEC innovation·2023

Same author

Digital markers of motor speech impairments in natural speech of patients with ALS-FTD spectrum disorders.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023

Same author

Feasibility and acceptability of remote smartphone cognitive testing in frontotemporal dementia research.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2023

Same author

Creating the Pick's disease International Consortium: Association study of <i>MAPT</i> H2 haplotype with risk of Pick's disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023

Same author

Data-driven neuropathological staging and subtyping of TDP-43 proteinopathies.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2023

Same author

Anterior cingulate sulcation is associated with onset and survival in frontotemporal dementia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023

Same journal

Dissecting first-episode psychosis heterogeneity with clustering analyses: a systematic review.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Same journal

Irisin and anxiety-like behaviors: Mechanistic integration of peripheral-central crosstalk, neuroinflammation and neural plasticity.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Same journal

Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Same journal

Rhythms of interaction - the timescales of social coordination and why they matter.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Same journal

Neural Bases of Memory Development: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

Same journal

Regional heterogeneity of brain insulin resistance: From molecular pathways to neural circuits.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026

See all related articles

Three distinct memory systems support different categorization strategies: rule-based (working memory), similarity-based (explicit long-term memory), and implicit long-term memory. Brain imaging and patient studies reveal unique neural correlates for each system.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuropsychology
Memory Systems

Background:

Categorization relies on distinct memory systems: working memory (WM), explicit long-term memory (explicit LTM), and implicit long-term memory (implicit LTM).
Understanding these systems is crucial for explaining cognitive processes and neurological disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

To review neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence differentiating three distinct categorization systems.
To contrast categorization based on WM versus explicit LTM.
To contrast categorization based on explicit LTM versus implicit LTM.

Main Methods:

Review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies.
Analysis of categorization tasks involving rule application (WM), similarity judgments (explicit LTM), and implicit learning.

Related Experiment Videos

Examination of patient data (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, medial-temporal lobe damage).

Main Results:

Rule-based categorization (WM) activates frontal/parietal areas; similarity-based (explicit LTM) activates parietal areas.
Patients with prefrontal damage are impaired in rule-based but not similarity-based categorization.
Explicit LTM categorization involves widespread frontal/parietal activation, while implicit LTM categorization shows posterior cortical deactivation.

Conclusions:

Categorization is supported by at least three distinct memory systems with unique neural underpinnings.
Neuropsychological and neuroimaging data converge to support these distinct categorization systems.
These findings advance our understanding of memory, cognition, and brain function.