Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics for embryos.

C Parker1

  • 1St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. elaine.hazell@leedsth.nhs.uk

Journal of Medical Ethics
|October 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper critiques arguments for destroying human embryos for medical research. It finds the ethical justifications for using human embryonic stem cells insufficient, concluding the morality remains unproven.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advanced and metastatic prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2026
Same author

Local and locoregional prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligoprogression in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Early Toxicity Analysis of the TRAP Trial.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2024
Same author

HISTOMONAS MELEAGRIDIS INFECTIONS IN TURKEYS IN THE USA: A CENTURY OF PROGRESS, RESURGENCE, AND TRIBUTE TO ITS EARLY INVESTIGATORS, THEOBALD SMITH, ERNST TYZZER, AND EVERETT LUND.

The Journal of parasitology·2024
Same author

The STAMPEDE2 Trial: a Site Survey of Current Patterns of Care, Access to Imaging and Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2023
Same author

Effects of 24-week prebiotic intervention on self-reported upper respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and markers of immunity in elite rugby union players.

European journal of sport science·2023
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Research Ethics

Background:

  • Debate surrounding the ethical use of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) in research.
  • DW Brock's argument for the moral permissibility of embryo destruction for hESC derivation.

Discussion:

  • Analyzes and refutes the specific conceptual arguments presented by Brock.
  • Highlights the insufficiency of Brock's reasoning in establishing the morality of embryo destruction.

Key Insights:

  • DW Brock's case for using human embryonic stem cells is technically presented but philosophically flawed.
  • The ethical debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research requires more robust argumentation than currently provided.

Outlook:

  • Further philosophical and ethical inquiry is needed to resolve the moral questions surrounding human embryonic stem cell research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Future research should focus on developing stronger ethical frameworks for controversial biomedical research.