Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Preserving left ventricular function during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Prithwish Banerjee1, Dip Card

  • 1Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, United Kingdom. banerjeep@aol.com

The Journal of Invasive Cardiology
|October 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Participant lived experiences of high-intensity interval training in UK cardiac rehabilitation (HIIT or MISS UK): A qualitative study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Voice recognition as an innovative method to identify and monitor heart failure - a review.

Heart failure reviews·2026
Same author

<i>Staphylococcus lugdunensis</i> endocarditis presenting with P wave asystole, valvular destruction and spontaneous closure of an acquired Gerbode defect.

BMJ case reports·2026
Same author

Advanced Clinical Practitioner-led Palliative Care Heart Failure Model within the National Health Service: A Prospective Study of Patient Experience, Healthcare Costs and End-of-life Outcomes.

European journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Multicentre quality improvement initiative to improve patient education and safety in the prescription of Sodium-Glucose transporter 2 inhibitors.

BMJ open quality·2025
Same author

Economic burden of heart failure in Europe: A systematic review of costs and cost-effectiveness.

ESC heart failure·2025
Same journal

Sex differences in reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-flow aortic stenosis.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2026
Same journal

Coronary computed tomography angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: proceedings from the 1st CCTA-guided PCI summit in the United States.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2026
Same journal

When not to pull: radial srtery spasm, catheter entrapment, and the value of waiting.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2026
Same journal

Severe coronary vasospasm mimicking STEMI after drug-coated balloon angioplasty.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2026
Same journal

Imaging insights into endothelial response: cardiac computed tomography assessment of WATCHMAN FLX and FLX Pro.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2026
Same journal

Differential effect of chronic kidney disease on right-sided extravalvular damage in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Coronary interventions can cause left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) despite preventing heart damage. Cardiologists must assess procedure risk and use strategies to minimize iatrogenic LVSD, protecting heart function.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • The heart failure epidemic is driven by coronary artery disease, improved treatments, and an aging population.
  • Coronary interventions, while beneficial, can paradoxically lead to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) by causing iatrogenic myocardial damage.
  • Preventing or limiting myocardial damage during coronary interventions is crucial for managing heart failure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss strategies for limiting myocardial damage during coronary interventions.
  • To highlight the risk of iatrogenic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) following coronary procedures.
  • To emphasize the need for risk stratification and tailored approaches to minimize LVSD induction.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of current literature on coronary intervention techniques and their impact on left ventricular function.
  • Analysis of strategies aimed at reducing myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary interventions.
  • Discussion of risk assessment tools for predicting LVSD post-intervention.

    • Main Results:

    • Coronary interventions carry a risk of inducing left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
    • Specific procedural techniques and patient factors influence the likelihood of iatrogenic LVSD.
    • Proactive risk assessment and management strategies can mitigate the incidence of LVSD.

    Conclusions:

    • Interventional cardiologists must actively manage the risk of iatrogenic LVSD during coronary interventions.
    • Qualifying procedures as high or low risk for LVSD induction is essential.
    • Implementing strategies to minimize myocardial damage is the next critical step in preventing heart failure.