Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Setting dietary intake levels: problems and pitfalls.

Robert M Russell¹

¹Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, School of Medicine and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111-1524, USA.

Novartis Foundation Symposium

|October 5, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Establishing nutrient intake recommendations requires overcoming data challenges and avoiding common pitfalls. Future revisions must ensure evidence-based criteria and consider population variability for accurate dietary guidance.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Opinion: Allow Golden Rice to save lives.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021

Same author

Dietary vitamin A intake recommendations revisited: global confusion requires alignment of the units of conversion and expression.

Public health nutrition·2017

Same author

Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)-Vitamin A Review.

The Journal of nutrition·2016

Same author

Current Capabilities and Limitations of Stable Isotope Techniques and Applied Mathematical Equations in Determining Whole-Body Vitamin A Status.

Food and nutrition bulletin·2016

Same author

Are dietary bioactives ready for recommended intakes?

Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)·2013

Same author

Carotenoids and total phenolic contents in plant foods commonly consumed in Korea.

Nutrition research and practice·2013

Same journal

Genetic and therapeutic control of diabetogenic CD8+ T cells.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009

Same journal

Translating mucosal antigen based prevention of autoimmune diabetes to human.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009

Same journal

Re-establishing immune tolerance in type 1 diabetes via regulatory T cells.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009

Same journal

Immune markers of disease and therapeutic intervention in type 1 diabetes.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009

Same journal

Towards a curative therapy in type 1 diabetes: remission of autoimmunity, maintenance and augmentation of beta cell mass.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009

Same journal

CD8 and cytotoxic T cells in type 1 diabetes.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Nutritional Science
Public Health Policy

Background:

Recommended dietary intake levels are crucial for food programs and policy.
The 1990s introduced a new paradigm for nutrient requirements, including Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), and Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL).

Purpose of the Study:

To identify challenges in setting nutrient intake levels and propose solutions for future revisions.
To highlight pitfalls in current methods for establishing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs).

Main Methods:

Review of existing methodologies for determining nutrient requirements.
Analysis of data challenges and limitations in current DRI setting.

Main Results:

Significant data gaps exist, including a lack of dose-response data and chronic study information.
Several pitfalls were identified: invalid assumptions about nutrient thresholds, inconsistent endpoint criteria, inappropriate extrapolation to children, and insufficient data on variability and interactions.

Conclusions:

Future revisions of nutrient intake recommendations must address identified data limitations and methodological pitfalls.
A need exists for evidence-based reviews, consideration of comparative risk, and improved understanding of DRI usage.