Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Using a Malcolm Baldrige framework to understand high-performing clinical microsystems.

Tina C Foster¹, Julie K Johnson, Eugene C Nelson

¹Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

Quality & Safety in Health Care

|October 5, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Applications of Chronic Care and Transitional Care Models to Surgical Populations: A Scoping Review.

The Journal of surgical research·2026

Same author

Perceptions of maternity care-seeking and care-giving experiences during a health-system shock: a qualitative study with healthcare professionals and policymakers in the UK, with a focus on care for marginalised groups.

BMJ public health·2026

Same author

Clinician perspectives on the feasibility of a pain management protocol in kidney transplant.

BMC nephrology·2026

Same author

Implementation and Effectiveness of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Children Undergoing Surgery: The ENRICH-US Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial.

JAMA surgery·2026

Same author

Women's experiences of maternity care in high-income countries during the pandemic health system shock: a follow-up systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Same author

A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient Identification Barriers and Facilitators in a Pediatric Surgery Randomized Control Trial.

The Journal of surgical research·2026

Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010

See all related articles

The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) criteria and clinical microsystem success factors overlap significantly in areas critical for high performance, offering insights for organizational improvement.

Area of Science:

Healthcare Management
Organizational Development
Quality Improvement

Background:

The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) offers a framework for organizational quality assessment used across various sectors.
The clinical microsystem is a systems approach to healthcare delivery rooted in organizational development and improvement theories.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare MBNQA healthcare criteria with high-performing clinical microsystem success factors.
To determine the extent of overlap between the two frameworks.
To enhance understanding of both MBNQA and clinical microsystems.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of the MBNQA healthcare criteria and clinical microsystem success factors.
Identification of common themes and areas of divergence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Both frameworks address critical areas for high performance, including leadership, work systems, service processes, performance results, and information technology.
The comparison highlights potential for deeper understanding and application of MBNQA criteria within microsystems.

Conclusions:

Significant alignment exists between MBNQA criteria and microsystem success characteristics.
The analysis provides a roadmap for leveraging MBNQA within microsystems, particularly in work system design and process understanding.
Tools for self-assessment using both frameworks are available.