Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Explicit versus implicit gaze processing assessed by ERPs.

Roxane J Itier1, Claude Alain, Natasa Kovacevic

  • 1The Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M6A 2E1. ritier@rotman-baycrest.on.ca

Brain Research
|October 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Young and old adult brains experience opposite effects of acute sleep restriction on the functional connectivity network.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The Effect of the Temporal Position of a Gap on Its Automatic Detection.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Enhanced Contour-Deviant Mismatch Negativity and Mnemonic Representations in Older Musicians.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Face memory is shaped more by fixation durations and sequences than by where observers fixate within the face.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Functional Dissociation of Mismatch Negativity From Late Discriminative Negativity Across the Adult Lifespan.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Corrosion Behaviour of Injection- and Compression-Moulded Nd-Fe-B and Sm-Fe-N Magnets with Different Polymer Binders.

Polymers·2026
Same journal

Targeting neurodevelopmental miR132-3p promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Variability in acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition across adulthood in Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 knockout mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Transcriptome-guided modeling reveals insulin-related metabolic dysfunction in SCA3 mouse cerebellum.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Electroacupuncture treatment enhances hippocampal growth hormone level and restores mitochondrial function in vascular dementia rats.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that people implicitly process gaze direction, even when focusing on head orientation. Event-related potentials reveal distinct neural markers for head and gaze processing, with early face perception depending on viewing angle.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Social Cognition

Background:

  • Gaze direction is a crucial social cue.
  • Understanding how the brain processes gaze direction, especially in relation to head orientation, is important for social interaction.
  • Previous research suggests automatic processing of social cues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural processing of gaze direction using event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • To examine whether gaze processing is affected by head orientation and task demands.
  • To differentiate the timing and characteristics of neural responses to head orientation versus gaze direction.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants performed two tasks: explicit gaze judgment and head orientation judgment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Front-view and 3/4-view faces with straight or averted gaze were presented.
  • Behavioral data (accuracy, reaction times) and ERP components (P1, N170) were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Behavioral accuracy and reaction times were influenced by the congruency of gaze and head direction, indicating implicit gaze processing.
    • Larger P1 and N170 amplitudes were observed for 3/4-view faces compared to front-view faces.
    • The N170 component was sensitive to gaze direction (averted vs. straight) for front-view faces only.
    • A later ERP component (400-600 ms) showed larger amplitudes for straight gaze compared to averted gaze, irrespective of task or head orientation.

    Conclusions:

    • Gaze direction is processed implicitly, even when participants focus on head orientation.
    • Neural processing of head orientation precedes that of gaze direction.
    • Early visual encoding of faces is dependent on the viewing angle (front-view vs. 3/4-view).
    • Head orientation and gaze discrimination interact at the decision-making level.