Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Estimating trend precision and power to detect trends across grouped count data
Brian R Gray1, Michele M Burlew
1Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, U.S. Geological Survey, La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603, USA. brgray@usgs.gov
Ecologists can now estimate the precision and power of trend estimates using grouped count data. This new analytical method, suitable for ecological surveys, offers a practical alternative to complex simulations.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Statistical Modeling
- Population Dynamics
Background:
- Ecologists frequently analyze grouped or clustered count data to assess temporal trends, abundance indices, and population abundance.
- Existing analytical methods often fail to account for the unique characteristics of grouped count data, such as variance increasing with the mean.
- There is a need for methods to prospectively estimate the precision of trend estimates and the statistical power to detect trends in grouped count data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and present an analytical method for estimating the precision and statistical power of trend estimates from grouped count data.
- To address the challenges posed by the relationship between sampling variance and mean, and the differing scales of variance estimates in grouped count data.
Main Methods:
- Proposed an analytical approach resembling a generalized linear mixed model with a negative binomial-distributed count variable and random group effects.
- Modeled the count mean linearly on the log scale, incorporating grand intercept, trend, and random group effects.
- Estimated sampling variance of the mean on the log scale using the delta method.
Main Results:
- The proposed analytical method yielded results comparable to Monte Carlo simulations for estimating standard errors and statistical power.
- Differences in standard errors and power were modest (< or = 11% and < or = 16%, respectively) compared to simulation estimates at a 5% trend.
- Relative differences in power estimates decreased further (< or = 7%) when simulation-based power exceeded 0.50.
- The method was validated using data from fingernail clam surveys in the Mississippi River.
Conclusions:
- The developed analytical method provides a practical way to estimate precision and power for trend detection in grouped count data.
- This approach is recommended when simulations are not feasible or when numerous power/precision calculations are needed, with simulation used for validation.
- The method effectively handles the complexities of grouped count data, offering a valuable tool for ecological trend analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
