Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy
01:24

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy

Published on: September 8, 2023

Microendoscopic discectomy, a less traumatic procedure for lumbar disk herniation.

Zhang Chao1, Zhou Yue, Chu Tong-wei

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.

Chinese Journal of Traumatology = Zhonghua Chuang Shang Za Zhi
|October 9, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

Herniated Intervertebral Disc l: Introduction01:29

Herniated Intervertebral Disc l: Introduction

Intervertebral disc herniation refers to the displacement of the nucleus pulposus (the gel-like inner core of the disc) through a tear or weakened area in the annulus fibrosus (the outer fibrous ring). The displaced disc material extends beyond the normal boundaries of the disc space and may compress or irritate nearby spinal nerve roots or, less commonly, the spinal cord.Etiology and Risk FactorsHerniation commonly results from degeneration, in which aging reduces disc hydration and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EEG brain network analysis of mind-wandering characteristics and its modulation by shift work in high-risk industries.

Cognitive neurodynamics·2026
Same author

Distinct mental fatigue mechanisms under prolonged work and night shifts Implications for safety management in a real-world oil drilling site.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same author

A qualitative study on medication literacy among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic respiratory disease·2026
Same author

Extending the time window for intravenous tenecteplase in patients with distal medium vessel occlusions stroke: study protocol and rationale.

Stroke and vascular neurology·2026
Same author

Predicting hourly traffic volume of urban signal intersections using Dynamically Weighted LightGBM.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

P2D-former for time-series forecasting with period-aware 2D representations and exogenous covariates.

Scientific reports·2026

This study compared two surgical techniques for treating lumbar disk herniation: microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy. Researchers measured inflammatory markers like interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and creatine kinase in patients before and after surgery. They also recorded operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, and pain levels. The results showed that microendoscopic discectomy caused less tissue trauma, with lower levels of inflammatory markers and less postoperative pain. Both groups had similar long-term outcomes at six months. The study suggests that microendoscopic discectomy may be a less traumatic option for patients, with benefits including shorter surgery time, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally invasive spinal surgery
  • Orthopedic trauma and inflammation biomarkers

Background:

Inflammation and tissue damage after spinal surgery are linked to recovery time and patient discomfort. Traditional open discectomy is known to cause significant soft tissue trauma. Researchers have long sought less invasive alternatives to reduce postoperative complications. Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is one such option, but its inflammatory impact remains unclear. Prior studies have shown that open procedures elevate markers like interleukin-6 and creatine kinase. However, no prior work had resolved whether MED leads to a similar or reduced inflammatory response. This gap motivated a direct comparison of inflammatory markers between MED and open discectomy. Understanding these differences could guide clinical choices for less traumatic interventions. No prior work had resolved the comparative inflammatory profiles of these two surgical approaches. This uncertainty drove the need for a controlled study with measurable inflammatory outcomes.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to compare inflammatory responses between microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for lumbar disk herniation. Researchers focused on serum levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and creatine kinase as key indicators of tissue trauma. The motivation stemmed from the need to evaluate whether MED reduces soft tissue damage compared to open techniques. By measuring these biomarkers, the team sought to determine if MED is less traumatic. The study also aimed to assess clinical outcomes, including pain and recovery time. Researchers wanted to ensure that any benefits of MED did not come at the cost of worse long-term results. The visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index were selected to measure pain and functional recovery. This approach allowed a direct comparison of both short-term and long-term effects between the two surgical methods.

Keywords:
inflammatory response surgeryspinal surgery techniquespostoperative recoveryminimally invasive spine procedures

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found that microendoscopic discectomy caused less tissue trauma, as shown by lower levels of interleukin-6, creatine kinase, and C-reactive protein.

The researchers measured interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and creatine kinase in blood samples taken before and after surgery.

These time points were chosen to capture the peak inflammatory response following both types of discectomy.

Pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale, which measures pain intensity on a continuous scale.

More Related Videos

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
10:09

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation

Published on: October 14, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy
01:24

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy

Published on: September 8, 2023

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
10:09

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation

Published on: October 14, 2022

Main Methods:

The study included 44 patients with single-level lumbar disk herniation. Participants were randomly assigned to either microendoscopic discectomy or open discectomy. Blood samples were collected before surgery and at 24 and 48 hours after the procedure. Researchers measured serum levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and creatine kinase. They also recorded operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay. Pain levels were assessed using the visual analog scale. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Oswestry disability index. Statistical analysis used analysis of variance and Student's t test to compare results between groups. This method allowed for a detailed comparison of inflammatory and clinical outcomes between the two surgical approaches.

Main Results:

Patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than those in the open discectomy group. The operating time was also shorter in the microendoscopic group. Postoperative hospital stay was reduced for patients receiving microendoscopic discectomy. Pain scores measured by the visual analog scale were lower in the microendoscopic group. Serum levels of interleukin-6 peaked at 24 hours and were lower in the microendoscopic group. Creatine kinase levels also peaked at 24 hours and were significantly lower in the microendoscopic group. C-reactive protein levels in the microendoscopic group peaked at 24 hours, while in the open group they peaked at 48 hours. At six months, both groups showed similar clinical outcomes based on the Oswestry disability index. These findings suggest that microendoscopic discectomy causes less tissue trauma than open discectomy.

Conclusions:

The study found that microendoscopic discectomy leads to a smaller inflammatory response than open discectomy. Lower levels of interleukin-6, creatine kinase, and C-reactive protein in the microendoscopic group support this conclusion. The shorter operating time and reduced blood loss further suggest less tissue trauma. Postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the microendoscopic group. Pain scores were consistently lower in this group as well. Clinical outcomes at six months were similar between the two groups. These results suggest that microendoscopic discectomy may be a less traumatic option for patients. The authors propose that this technique could be preferred when minimizing inflammation and recovery time is a priority.

Clinical outcomes were assessed at six months post-surgery using the Oswestry disability index.

The authors propose that microendoscopic discectomy may be less traumatic, with reduced inflammation and shorter recovery times.