Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response growth using a low-frequency suppressor.

Jeffrey J DiGiovanni1, Padmaja Nair

  • 1Auditory Psychophysics and Signal Processing Laboratory, School of Hearing, Speech and Language Sciences, W151a Grover Center, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. digiovan@ohio.edu

Hearing Research
|October 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity.

American journal of audiology·2019
Same author

Exploration of Head Related Transfer Function and Environmental Sounds as a Means to Improve Auditory Scanning for Children Requiring Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2019
Same author

Dominance of persistence over adaptation in forward masking.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2018
Same author

The Interprofessional Education Environment: Places and Pedagogies.

Seminars in speech and language·2017
Same author

High- and Low-Frequency Decrement Contribution to Spectral Enhancement.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.

American journal of audiology·2011
Same journal

Electrophysiologically-based electrode selection has the potential to improve speech perception in cochlear-implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Multivariate prediction of conductive dysfunction in well and NICU newborns using wideband acoustic immittance with acoustic reflex tests.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

TGF-β signaling regulates flat epithelium formation in severely injured adult mouse utricle through epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Membrane scaffolding in auditory hair cells - a molecular tightrope walk enables lateral wall stiffness and flexibility.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Speech-in-noise recognition during hearing protector use: Human performance and acoustic prediction.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of hair cell loss from audiograms.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated two-tone suppression, finding that increasing suppressor loudness enhances suppression effects. The probe tone

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Two-tone suppression is a well-studied auditory phenomenon.
  • Previous research linked suppression magnitude to suppressee levels, suggesting basilar membrane response linearization with high-frequency suppressors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of a low-frequency suppressor's intensity on two-tone suppression.
  • To expand upon previous findings regarding the relationship between suppressor level and suppression magnitude.

Main Methods:

  • Measured the detection of a 4.0-kHz probe tone under forward-masking conditions.
  • Utilized a 4.0-kHz masker (suppressee) with and without a 2.2-kHz suppressor.
  • Varied the masker level adaptively and measured probe detection across different suppressor levels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The magnitude of suppression increased as the suppressor level increased.
  • Generally, the probe tone level did not influence the magnitude of suppression.

Conclusions:

  • Low-frequency suppressor intensity positively correlates with the magnitude of two-tone suppression.
  • The relationship between probe level and suppression magnitude is not a primary factor in this paradigm.