Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Impact of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a clinical and echocardiographic study
Jeffrey W H Fung1, John E Sanderson, Gabriel W K Yip
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) is linked to worse diastolic dysfunction and poorer clinical outcomes, including higher rates of hospitalization and death, compared to HFNEF patients in sinus rhythm.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- The clinical impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) is not well-defined.
- HFNEF represents a significant patient population with distinct pathophysiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical significance and outcomes of AF in patients diagnosed with HFNEF.
- To compare HFNEF patients with and without AF regarding clinical characteristics, diastolic function, and prognosis.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study of 238 hospitalized heart failure patients, categorizing them into HFNEF (EF ≥ 50%) and systolic HF (EF < 50%).
- Clinical, echocardiographic, and functional status data were analyzed, with a focus on comparing HFNEF patients with and without AF.
- Follow-up data were collected to assess recurrent hospitalizations and mortality.
Main Results:
- HFNEF patients with AF exhibited worse New York Heart Association class, reduced 6-minute walk distance, and poorer quality of life compared to those in sinus rhythm.
- Patients with HFNEF and AF demonstrated more severe diastolic dysfunction.
- The incidence of recurrent heart failure hospitalization or death was significantly higher in HFNEF patients with AF (28.6%) versus sinus rhythm (10.6%).
Conclusions:
- Atrial fibrillation in HFNEF is associated with increased diastolic dysfunction severity.
- AF and restrictive diastolic dysfunction are independent predictors of adverse outcomes, including hospitalization or death, in HFNEF patients.
- These findings highlight the importance of managing AF in HFNEF to improve patient prognosis.
Background:
The clinical significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) remains undetermined.
Methods And Results:
We compared the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics among 238 patients hospitalized for HF. Using the cutoff of left ventricular EF of 50%, there were 146 patients with HFNEF (AF = 42) and 92 with systolic HF (AF = 30). When compared among HFNEF, the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (2.61 +/- 0.51 versus 2.21 +/- 0.46; P < .05), 6-minute walk distance (279.7 +/- 66.0 versus 338.0 +/- 86.1 m; P < .01), quality of life score (26.1 +/- 14.3 versus 19.5 +/- 10.3; P < .05), and previous HF hospitalization were significantly worse in the AF group. These variables were significantly better in HFNEF than systolic HF with sinus rhythm, but the differences were not detected among those with AF. Patients with HFNEF and AF were associated with more severe diastolic dysfunction when compared to sinus rhythm. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months, the proportion of HFNEF patients in AF with recurrent HF hospitalization or death was significantly higher than those in sinus rhythm (28.6% versus 10.6%; P < .01). Both AF and restrictive diastolic dysfunction were independent predictors of HF hospitalization or death in HFNEF.
Conclusion:
Patients with HFNEF and AF were associated with more severe diastolic dysfunction and worse clinical outcomes than those in sinus rhythm.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
