Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Meta-analysis: methods for combining data to improve quantitative risk assessment.

R M Putzrath1, M E Ginevan

  • 1Organization Resources Counselors, Inc., Washington, DC 20036.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|October 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children's health, susceptibility, and regulatory approaches to reducing risks from chemical carcinogens.

Environmental health perspectives·2001
Same author

Inaccurate models for mixtures.

Environmental health perspectives·2001
Same author

Doses and lung burdens of environmental tobacco smoke constituents in nonsmoking workplaces.

Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology·2000
Same author

Fundamentals of health risk assessment. Use, derivation, validity and limitations of safety indices.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2000
Same author

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace and the impact of away-from-work exposure.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2000
Same author

Use of environmental tobacco smoke constituents as markers for exposure.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2000

This study explores meta-analysis for combining cancer bioassay data on trichloroethylene. Applying Monte Carlo methods refined risk assessment by reducing the upper confidence limit for cancer potency factors.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Environmental Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Individual studies are often qualitatively or quantitatively assessed for risk assessment, but data is not always combined.
  • Meta-analysis offers a method for jointly evaluating results from multiple studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate simple meta-analytic techniques using two cancer bioassays of trichloroethylene.
  • To evaluate the validity and value of meta-analytic procedures in risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of individual cancer bioassay studies.
  • Application of meta-analysis, specifically Monte Carlo procedures, to combine data.
  • Calculation of the upper 95% confidence limit and cancer potency factor.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The upper 95% confidence limit is highly dependent on assumptions when multiple datasets are involved.
  • Monte Carlo procedures increased the upper 95% confidence limit compared to EPA's value.
  • Determining the variance of the maximum likelihood estimate reduced the 95% upper confidence limit of the cancer potency factor.

Conclusions:

  • Meta-analysis is a valuable tool for joint evaluation of multiple study results in risk assessment.
  • Careful consideration of statistical assumptions is crucial for accurate risk assessment when combining data.
  • The applied meta-analytic techniques provide a more refined estimation of cancer risk from trichloroethylene exposure.