Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Prevalence of Incontinence and Its Association With Urinary Tract Infections, Dermatitis, Slips and Falls, and Behavioral Disturbances Among Older Adults in Medicare Fee-for-Service.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2024

Same author

Patient Post-discharge Transitions and Inpatient Readmissions Impose Costly Burdens for Employers and Carriers.

Population health management·2021

Same author

Impact of Cost on the Safety of Cancer Pharmaceuticals.

Cancer treatment and research·2018

Same author

Augmented Intelligence: Enhancing the Roles of Health Actuaries and Health Economists for Population Health Management.

Population health management·2017

Same author

Safety of Cancer Therapies: At What Cost?

Population health management·2017

Same author

Are telehealth technologies for hypertension care and self-management effective or simply risky and costly?

Population health management·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Reliability and validity: a quick review.

Karen Fitzner¹

¹The American Association of Diabetes Educators, Chicago, Illinois

The Diabetes Educator

|October 11, 2007

Summary

Researchers should use reliability and validity testing when developing tools for diabetes education. This ensures that assessment techniques and tools for diabetes self-management training are accurate and dependable for practice settings.

Area of Science:

Health Professions Education
Medical Education
Diabetes Education

Background:

Reliability and validity are crucial for developing and selecting research tools in health professions.
Diabetes education relies on accurate and dependable tools for effective self-management training.
Ensuring the quality of assessment instruments is vital for evidence-based practice.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the fundamental concepts of reliability and validity testing.
To provide guidance for researchers in diabetes education on selecting and developing assessment tools.
To introduce a practical checklist for evaluating the reliability and validity of research instruments.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on reliability and validity testing.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Definition of various types of reliability and validity (e.g., face, construct, external validity).

Development of a user-friendly checklist for research application.

Main Results:

Understanding different types of validity and reliability is essential for tool development.
Basic testing (face, construct validity) can establish initial tool appropriateness.
Comprehensive evaluations may require advanced validation, including external validity.

Conclusions:

Diabetes educators must rigorously test the reliability and validity of assessment tools.
Incorporating robust testing ensures the quality and applicability of tools in diabetes self-management training.
Reliable and valid tools enhance the effectiveness of diabetes education practices.